Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Welfare Fund et al v. Even - Temp, Incorporated

Filing 18

MOTION by Plaintiffs Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Educational Fund, Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Industry Fund, Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Pension Fund, Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Savings Fund, Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Supplemental Retirement Plan, Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Welfare Fund, Sheet Metal Workers' International Association Local Union No. 265, Scott P. Wille for judgment entry (Scanlon, Cecilia)

Download PDF
Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Welfare Fund et al v. Even - Temp, Incorporated Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 265 WELFARE FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. EVEN - TEMP, INCORPORATED, an Illinois corporation, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 13 C 2049 JUDGE GARY FEINERMAN MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys, default having been entered against the Defendant on June 12, 2013, request this Court enter judgment against Defendant, EVEN - TEMP, INCORPORATED, an Illinois corporation. In support of that Motion, Plaintiffs state: 1. On June 12, 2013, this Court entered default against Defendant and granted Plaintiffs’ request for an order directing Defendant to turn over its monthly fringe benefit contribution reports for September 2012 through June 2013. 2. The Administrative Manager for Plaintiff Funds advised Plaintiffs’ counsel on July 31, 2013 that Defendant submitted its fringe benefit contribution reports for the months of September 2012 through June 2013 indicating minimal hours worked. Pursuant to Defendant’s collective bargaining agreement with Sheet Metal Workers’ International Association, Local 265, Defendant is obligated to report and pay contributions on no less that 117 hours per month. (See Affidavit of Scott P. Wille). Dockets.Justia.com 3. Accordingly, Plaintiffs have calculated the amount of contributions due and owing from Defendant for the months of September 2012 through June 2013, based on 117 hours per month, to be $29,226.68. 4. Additionally, the amount of $2,922.67 is due for liquidated damages. (Wille Aff. Par. 5. In addition, Plaintiffs’ firm has expended $400.00 in costs and $1,921.00 in 5). reasonable attorneys’ fees in this matter. (See Affidavit of Catherine M. Chapman). 6. Based upon the documents attached hereto, Plaintiffs request entry of judgment in the total amount of $34,470.35. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to enter judgment in the amount of $34,470.35. /s/ Cecilia M. Scanlon Cecilia M. Scanlon Attorney for Plaintiffs BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD. 200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200 Chicago, IL 60606-5231 Bar No.: 6288574 Telephone: (312) 236-4316 Facsimile: (312) 236-0241 E-Mail: cscanlon@baumsigman.com I:\265J\Even Temp\#24365\motion-judgment.cms.df.wpd 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned, an attorney of record, hereby certifies that she electronically filed the foregoing document (Motion for Entry of Judgment) with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, and further certifies that I have mailed the above-referenced document by United States Mail to the following non-CM/ECF participant on or before the hour of 5:00 p.m. this 12th day of August 2013: Mr. Steven A. Klem, Registered Agent Even - Temp, Incorporated 134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1810 Chicago, IL 60602-1154 Mr. Anthony Pendola, President Even - Temp, Incorporated 6304 Sondra Court Plainfield, IL 60586 Mr. Anthony Pendola, President Even - Temp, Incorporated 1081 Caton Farm Road, Unit E Lockport, IL 60441 /s/ Cecilia M. Scanlon Cecilia M. Scanlon Attorney for Plaintiffs BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD. 200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200 Chicago, IL 60606-5231 Bar No.: 6288574 Telephone: (312) 236-4316 Facsimile: (312) 236-0241 E-Mail: cscanlon@baumsigman.com I:\265J\Even Temp\#24365\motion-judgment.cms.df.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?