Young v. Anne Stone, Inc.

Filing 22

MOTION by Defendant Anne Stone, Inc. for judgment on the pleading (Laff, Charles)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ROGER YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. ANNE STONE, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1: 13-cv-04920 Hon. Robert W. Gettleman Mag. J. Michael T. Mason DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS As set forth in the Minute Entry dated February 6, 2014 (ECF 21), defendant Anne Stone, Inc. (“Anne Stone”) respectfully moves the Court for judgment on the pleadings and to dismiss the complaint filed plaintiff Roger Young with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). The grounds for this Motion are set forth in Anne Stone’s Memorandum in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, being filed contemporaneously with the Motion. Dated: February 28, 2014 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Charles A. Laff Charles A. Laff calaff@michaelbest.com Gilberto E. Espinoza geespinoza@michaelbest.com MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP Two Prudential Plaza 180 N. Stetson Avenue, Suite 2000 Chicago, Illinois 60601-6710 Telephone: 312.222.0800 Facsimile: 312.222.0818 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ROGER YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. ANNE STONE, INC., Defendant. Case No. 1: 13-cv-04920 Hon. Robert W. Gettleman Mag. J. Michael T. Mason Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 28th day of February 2014, a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system and was served on the following counsel as indicated below. Alan Littmann Doug Winnard GOLDMAN ISMAIL TOMASELLI BRENNAN & BAUM LLP 564 West Randolph Street, Suite 400 Chicago, Illinois 60661 Via CM/ECF Service Via First Class Mail Via E-mail: alittmann@goldmanismail.com dwinnard@goldmanismail.com /s/ Charles A. Laff Charles A. Laff 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?