United States of America v. Gutierrez-Ceja
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Defendant's motion for sentencing reduction is denied. See Order for further details. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable James B. Zagel on 9/9/2015. Mailed notice(ep, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
SANTIAGO GUTIERREZ-CEJA,
v.
No. 13 C 6768
Judge James B. Zagel
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
On May 19, 2011, Defendant Santiago Gutierrez-Ceja was charged by indictment with
one count of illegal reentry by a deported alien in violation of Title 8, United States Code,
Section 1326(a) and (b)(2), and Title 6, United States Code, Section 202(4). [Dkt. 1, 11 CR
362.] On October 28, 2011, the defendant pleaded guilty to the sole count pursuant to a written
plea agreement. [Dkt. 14, 11 CR 362.] Defendant currently seeks a two-level deduction under
Amendment 782 of the Sentencing Guidelines. This would be possible if the two-level deduction
were related to a prior sentence of a drug trafficking offense, but this is not the case.
Amendment 782 proposed a change to Guidelines §§ 2D1.1 and 2D1.11. Because
Defendant was convicted of illegal reentry by a deported alien, Defendant’s Sentencing
Guidelines calculations were based on Guideline § 2L1.2. Amendment 782 therefore does not
apply to his case. Defendant’s criminal sentence was final upon completion of direct review of
the case by the Seventh Circuit, and I lack jurisdiction to revisit it. Defendant’s motion for
sentencing reduction is denied.
ENTER:
James B. Zagel
United States District Judge
DATE: September 9, 2015
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?