Sangster et al v. Lemke et al

Filing 11

MEMORANDUM Order:Accordingly both the current Application 9 and the current Motion 10 are denied as moot. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 2/14/2014:Mailed notice(srn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
JULIUS J. SANGSTER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
MICHAEL LEMKE, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 13 C 8488

MEMORANDUM ORDER
This Court has just received the Judge's Copy of an In Forma Pauperis Application
("Application") signed by co-plaintiff Julius Sangster ("Sangster") and a Motion for
Appointment of Counsel ("Motion") submitted by both plaintiffs, Sangster and Cynita Collins.
Both of those documents are much belated partial responses to this Court's November 27, 2013
memorandum order ("Order") that dismissed this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).
Because the Order concluded by denying both the then-tendered Application and Motion as
moot, this Court sees little point (if any) in dealing with the current submissions (which have
their own defects). Accordingly both the current Application and the current Motion are also
denied as moot.

__________________________________________
Milton I. Shadur
Senior United States District Judge
Date: February 14, 2014