Bergiste v. Capital One Bank

Filing 10

AGREED ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE. Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by the parties: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Marjorie Bergiste v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.; Rubin & Debski, P.A.; and Arthur Drew Rubin, is dis missed in its entirety, with prejudice, each Party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 6/6/2014. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE
CAPITAL ONE TELEPHONE
CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT
LITIGATION
This document relates to:
MARJORIE BERGISTE,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.;
RUBIN & DEBSKI, P.A.; and ARTHUR
DREW RUBIN,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Master Docket No. 1:12-cv-10064
MDL No. 2416

Case No: 1:14-CV-02594

AGREED ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by the parties:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Marjorie Bergiste v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.;
Rubin & Debski, P.A.; and Arthur Drew Rubin, is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, each
Party shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).

Dated: June 6, 2014
JAMES F. HOLDERMAN
United States District Judge