Amin v. SunTrust Bank et al

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order:The case was dismissed and judgment entered on July 11, 2014. Any disagreement with the action must be done, if timely, through an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, as there is presently no case before this Court. To the extent the Plaintiff's affidavit is considered a motion for recusal, it is denied as moot. 7 Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 7/24/2014:Mailed notice(srn, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
CHIRAG AMIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
SUNTRUST BANK; CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY
OF AMERICA; RENELL LEWIS; WESTERN
UNION; ASSOCIATED BANK, N.A.;
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM;
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.; CHICAGO
SUN-TIMES; GOOGLE, INC.; ABB, LTD.;
and TAYLOR MARK;
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 14 C 3903
Judge Thomas M. Durkin

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Only July 11, 2014, an order was entered dismissing the case. On July 22,
2014, Plaintiff filed an affidavit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 144. The affidavit stated
that the Court, through its order, has exhibited “pervasive” personal bias and
prejudice against the Plaintiff, “of such nature that [Plaintiff] will not receive right
to trial on merits (sic) based on Judge Durkin’s clear inability to render ‘fair and
impartial’ judgment in this civil action.” The Plaintiff then asks that the Court
proceed no further in this civil case and that another U.S. District Court Judge be
assigned to it.
The case was dismissed and judgment entered on July 11, 2014. Any
disagreement with the action must be done, if timely, through an appeal to the U.S.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, as there is presently no case before this
Court.
To the extent the Plaintiff’s affidavit is considered a motion for recusal, it is
denied as moot.
ENTERED:

______________________________
Honorable Thomas M. Durkin
United States District Judge

Dated: July 24, 2014

2