Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Frate Service, Inc.
Filing
24
MOTION by Plaintiffs Arthur H. Bunte, Jr., Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund for judgment Motion for Order of Contempt and Entry of Judgment against A nthony L. Reising and Lacey L. Reising (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Citation Docs, # 2 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Service of Citation, # 3 Exhibit C - Deposition Transcript, # 4 Exhibit D - Boblak Affidavit, # 5 Exhibit D-1 - Frate Account Statements, # 6 Exhibit D-2 - Reising Account Statements, # 7 Exhibit D-3 - Transaction Summaries, # 8 Exhibit D-4 - Judgment Breakdown)(Jahner, Corey)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND
SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND;
CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND
SOUTHWEST AREAS HEALTH AND
WELFARE FUND; and ARTHUR H.
BUNTE, JR., as Trustee,
Plaintiffs,
v.
FRATE SERVICE, INC., an Illinois
corporation,
Defendant.
)
)
)
) Case No. 14-cv-5755
)
) Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr.
)
) Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ORDER OF CONTEMPT OF COURT
AND ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AGAINST
ANTHONY L. REISING AND LACEY L. REISING
NOW COME Plaintiffs, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare
Fund (the “Health Fund”), Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund (the
“Pension Fund”; collectively with the Health Fund, the “Funds”), and Arthur H. Bunte, Jr., as
Trustee, and respectfully request that this Court enter an order: (1) holding Anthony L. Reising
and Lacey L. Reising in contempt of Court; and (2) entering judgment against Anthony L. Reising
and Lacey L. Reising. In support of this Motion, Plaintiffs state as follows:
FACTS
The Judgment and Citation.
1.
Defendant Frate Service, Inc. (“Frate”) is an employer that was obligated to remit
fringe benefit contributions to the Funds. (Dkt. No. 9, ¶ 1.)
TM: 568994 / 14110072 / 10/17/18
-1-
2.
On July 28, 2014, Plaintiffs filed this action against Frate to collect delinquent
contributions, interest, penalties, audit fees and costs, attorneys’ fees and costs, and post-judgment
interest. (Dkt. 1.)
3.
On September 23, 2014, this Court entered a Judgment against Frate in favor of the
Pension Fund in the total principal amount of $18,061.19, and in favor of the Health Fund in the
total principal amount of $859.79, plus post-judgment interest thereon, to be compounded annually
(the “Frate Judgment”). (Dkt. 9.)
4.
On October 2, 2014, the Clerk of this Court issued a Citation in Supplemental
Proceedings to Discover Assets (“Citation”) to Frate. The Citation was addressed to Anthony L.
Reising (“Mr. Reising”) as President of Frate. A true and accurate copy of the Citation is attached
hereto as Exhibit A.
5.
Pursuant to 735 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/2-1402(f)(1), the Citation contained the following
provision forbidding Frate from transferring assets:
YOU ARE PROHIBITED from making or allowing any transfer or other
disposition of, or interfering with, any property not exempt from
enforcement of a judgment, a deduction order or garnishment belonging to
the judgment debtor or to which he or she or it may be entitled or which
may hereafter be acquired by or become due to him or her or it, and from
paying over or otherwise disposing of any moneys not so exempt which are
due or to become due to the judgment debtor, until further order of the Court
or termination of these proceedings, whichever occurs first.
(Ex. A at 1.)
6.
On October 22, 2014, the Citation was served on Frate, through Mr. Reising. A true
and accurate copy of the Affidavit of Service of the Citation is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
7.
At the time that Frate was served with the Citation, Mr. Reising was the sole
shareholder and President of Frate. (Exhibit C, Transcript of Citation Deposition of Anthony L.
Reising, conducted June 11, 2018 (hereinafter, “Reising Transcript, Ex. C”), 10:12-24, 11:1-11.)
TM: 568994 / 14110072 / 10/17/18
-2-
8.
At the time Frate was served with the Citation, Mr. Reising and Lacey L. Reising
(“Mrs. Reising”; collectively with Mr. Reising, the “Reisings”) were both officers of Frate.
(Reising Transcript, Ex. C at 17:15-17, 68:21-24, 69:1-19.)
9.
At all times relevant, including at the time Frate was served with the Citation, the
Reisings have been the only two individuals with signing authority on Frate’s bank account.
(Reising Transcript, Ex. C at 36:2-22.)
10.
At all times relevant, including at the time Frate was served with the Citation, Mrs.
Reising was solely responsible for the handling of Frate’s administrative functions, including but
not limited to billing matters, payroll, and paperwork. (Reising Transcript, Ex. C at 14:18-24, 15:120, 79:13-21.)
The Post-Citation Transfers.
11.
Mr. Reising sat for his citation deposition on June 11, 2018. 1 (See Reising
Transcript, Ex. C.)
12.
Frate’s document production pursuant to the Citation, and pursuant to a separate
Citation to Discover Assets following the Withdrawal Judgment (see footnote 1, supra), included
certain of Frate’s checking account statements as well as certain of the Reisings’ checking account
statements. (¶¶ 5-8 of Affidavit of Joseph Boblak, attached hereto as Exhibit D (hereinafter,
“Boblak Affidavit, Ex. D”).)
The amount of time elapsed between the service of the Citation and the taking of Mr. Reising’s deposition
is largely due to the Pension Fund’s filing of a separate withdrawal liability suit against Frate in a matter
captioned Central States, Se. and Sw. Areas Pens. Fund, et al. v. Frate Service, Inc., Case No. 16-cv-4346
(April 15, 2016) (the “Withdrawal Lawsuit”). The parties opted to postpone the instant action’s citation
proceedings, pending the result of the Withdrawal Lawsuit. Summary judgment was entered in the
Withdrawal Lawsuit in favor of the Pension Fund and against Frate on November 28, 2017 (the
“Withdrawal Judgment”).
1
TM: 568994 / 14110072 / 10/17/18
-3-
13.
These records indicate that during 2016, approximately 65 checks were issued from
Frate’s account in the total amount of $159,007.18 (the “Post-Citation Transfers”). (Boblak
Affidavit, Ex. D, ¶ 10.)
14.
Of the 65 checks issued in 2016, 34 are identical in amount to, and were drawn
from Frate’s account within 1-3 days of, 34 matching deposits into the Reisings’ personal account
(the “Reising Transfers”). The Reising Transfers individually ranged in amount from $50.00 to
$4,600.00, and the combined total amount thereof was $82,683.18. (Boblak Affidavit, Ex. D, ¶
11.)
15.
Thus, it is clear that Frate issued 34 checks in the total amount of $82,683.18 which
the Reisings subsequently deposited into their own personal account.
16.
Even though the Citation was served on Frate on October 22, 2014, and expressly
prohibited Frate from transferring funds, the Reisings, as signatories to Frate’s account, continued
to make transfers in and out of Frate’s account, including the $82,683.18 in checks they wrote to
themselves during 2016 alone.
17.
While Frate continued to transfer assets and write checks to its own principals in
violation of the Citation, it did not pay the Frate Judgment.
ARGUMENT
18.
An individual may be held in civil contempt where he or she is responsible for a
violation of “an unequivocal command” set forth in a “decree from the court.” Grove Fresh
Distributors, Inc. v. John Labatt, Ltd., 299 F.3d 635, 642 (7th Cir. 2002). In addition, under Illinois
law, which Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69(a) makes applicable to post-judgment procedures
in this court, “corporate officers are obligated to obey judicial orders directed at their corporations,
and are liable when they permit the corporation to make non-exempt payments in violation of the
TM: 568994 / 14110072 / 10/17/18
-4-
citation.” Laborers’ Pension v. A&C Environmental, Inc., No. 99 C 8300, 2005 WL 994525, at *2
(N.D. Ill. Apr. 19, 2005) (citation omitted).
19.
Here, by violating the Citation’s prohibition on transferring assets, the Post-Citation
Transfers violated an unequivocal command contained in a standing order of this Court.
Accordingly, this Court should hold Anthony L. Reising and Lacey L. Reising in contempt for the
Post-Citation Transfers made from Frate’s account after service of the Citation, and hold them
personally liable for the amount of the Frate Judgment, since the amount of the Post-Citation
Transfers exceeds the outstanding amount of the Frate Judgment.
The Post-Citation Transfers violated the Citation, a standing Court order.
20.
Under Illinois law, properly serving a citation in supplemental proceedings to
discover assets creates a lien on all property belonging to the judgment debtor that is in the
judgment debtor’s possession or control. 735 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/2-1402(m)(1); see also, e.g., City
of Chicago v. Air Auto Leasing Co., 697 N.E.2d 788, 791 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). The lien is perfected
on the date of service. E.g., In re Sarah Michaels, Inc., 358 B.R. 366, 374 (N.D. Ill. 2007).
21.
Further, under Illinois law, a citation to discover assets “may prohibit the party to
whom it is directed from making or allowing any transfer or other disposition of, or interfering
with, any property not exempt from the enforcement of a judgment therefrom . . . until the further
order of the court or the termination of the proceeding, whichever occurs first. ” 735 Ill. Comp.
Stat. 5/2-1402(f)(1). Citation proceedings terminate six months after the judgment debtor’s
representative sits for the Citation deposition. Ill. Sup. Ct. R. 277(f).
22.
Here, as discussed, the Citation to Frate expressly prohibited Frate from transferring
any assets.
23.
Notably, there are only two exceptions to the prohibition against transfer. 735 Ill.
Comp. Stat. 5/2-1402(f)(1); Air Auto Leasing, 697 N.E.2d at 791. First, there is an exception for
TM: 568994 / 14110072 / 10/17/18
-5-
transfers of property exempt from the enforcement of a judgment, such as social security and public
assistance benefits. See 735 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/2-1402(b), (f)(1); Air Auto Leasing, 697 N.E.2d at
791. The second exception applies to property of the judgment debtor in the hands of third parties
which exceeds twice the amount of the balance the judgment creditor seeks to enforce. 735 Ill.
Comp. Stat. 5/2-1402(f)(1); see also, e.g., Air Auto Leasing, 697 N.E.2d at 791. Neither exception
applies here.
24.
Further, there is no statutory exception for payment of ordinary business expenses,
including professional services. Bank of Am., N.A. v. Freed, 971 N.E.2d 1087, 1095 (Ill. App. Ct.
2012); Air Auto Leasing, 697 N.E.2d at 791-92; Laborers’ Pens. Fund v. Dominic Jr., Inc., No. 02
C 3321, 2003 WL 21310282, at *2-3 (N.D. Ill. June 5, 2003).
25.
Thus, the Post-Citation Transfers violated the Citation’s prohibition against
transferring Frate’s assets, because all of them were made after the Citation was served but before
the termination of the Citation. Further, none of the Post-Citation Transfers fell under either of the
narrow exceptions to the prohibition.
This Court should hold the Reisings in contempt for the transfers made from Frate’s
account, and enter judgment against them.
26.
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-1402(f)(1) and the Illinois Supreme Court Rule 277(h),
any person who fails to obey a citation may be held in contempt and the court may enter judgment
against the party in the amount of the unpaid portion of the judgment or in the amount of the value
of the property transferred, whichever is lesser. See Shales v. Lanas Constr., Inc., No. 07 C 2970,
2010 WL 3842362, at *4 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 24, 2010).
27.
As officers of Frate (and in Mr. Reising’s case, its sole shareholder), the Reisings
were obligated to comply with the provisions of the Citation that prohibited the transfer of assets.
Shales, 2010 WL 3842362, at *5-6; For Your Ease Only, Inc. v. Calgon Carbon Corp., No. 02 C
TM: 568994 / 14110072 / 10/17/18
-6-
7345, 2009 WL 3255236, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 6, 2009); Fox Valley Laborers Fringe Benefit Funds
v. Pride of the Fox Masonry and Expert Restorations, No. 94 C 4289, 1996 WL 137654, at *8
(N.D. Ill. March 25, 1996).
28.
The Reisings’ acts of permitting the transfer of Frate’s assets after personal service
of the Citation establishes a willful violation of the Citation. West Bend Mutual Ins. Co. v. Belmont
State Co., No. 09 C 354, 2010 WL 5419061, at *10-11 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 23, 2010); Fox Valley
Laborers, 1996 WL 137654, at *8-9.
29.
Due to the Reisings’ willful disregard of the Citation prohibiting the transfer of
Frate’s assets, this Court should find them both in contempt in accordance with 735 ILCS 5/21402(f)(1) and Illinois Supreme Court Rule 277(h).
30.
In addition to a finding of contempt, 735 ILCS 5/2-1402(f)(1) also provides that
this Court may enter a judgment against the Reisings, personally, for their failure to obey the
Citation “in the amount of the unpaid portion of the judgment and costs allowable under this
Section, or in the amount of the value of the property transferred, whichever is lesser.” See also
Shales, 2010 WL 3842362, at *7-8; A & C Environmental, 2005 WL 994525, at *3-4; Fox Valley
Laborers, 1996 WL 137654, at * 8-9.
31.
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-1402(h), this Court may award the Funds the attorneys’
fees and costs incurred in bringing this motion. Shales, 2010 WL 3842362, at *7.
32.
Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1303, interest on a money judgment accrues at the rate of nine
percent (9%) per annum from the date of the judgment until paid in full.
33.
On November 7, 2014, the Funds recovered $2,564.81 via garnishment, but no
additional amounts have been recovered toward the Frate Judgment. As such, the total amount of
$20,684.76 remains unpaid on the Frate Judgment (which amount includes the principal amount
TM: 568994 / 14110072 / 10/17/18
-7-
of $20,553.94, plus $130.82 in post-judgment interest thereon through October 23, 2018). (Boblak
Affidavit, Ex. D, ¶¶ 12-15.)
34.
Here, the amount of the unpaid portion of the Frate Judgment is less than the value
of the Post-Citation Transfers. Accordingly, as a remedy for the Reisings’ willful failure to comply
with the Citation, the Fund requests the entry of a judgment against the Reisings, personally, for:
(i) the $20,684.76 outstanding amount of the Frate Judgment (which amount includes the principal
amount of $20,553.94, plus $130.82 in post-judgment interest thereon through October 23, 2018);
(ii) all attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by the Funds in connection with this proceeding; and (iii)
interest on the foregoing amounts at the rate of nine percent (9%) per annum from the date of
judgment.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and
Welfare Fund; Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund; and Arthur H. Bunte,
Jr., trustee, respectfully request that the Court enter an Order as follows:
(a)
That Anthony L. Reising and Lacey L. Reising are held in Contempt of Court for
violating the Citation that was personally served upon Anthony L. Reising as the president of Frate
Service, Inc.;
(b)
That a judgment is entered against Anthony L. Reising and Lacey L. Reising,
personally, and jointly and severally, for the $20,684.76 that is outstanding on the Frate Judgment,
plus all attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by the Funds in connection with this proceeding together
with the interest on the foregoing amounts at the rate of nine percent (9%) per annum from the
date of Judgment;
(c)
For other such relief deemed just and proper.
TM: 568994 / 14110072 / 10/17/18
-8-
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Corey J. Jahner
Corey J. Jahner (ARDC # 6313125)
Central States Funds Law Department
9377 W. Higgins Road, 10th Floor
Rosemont, Illinois 60018
Telephone: (847) 939-2470
E-mail: cjahner@centralstates.org
October 17, 2018
TM: 568994 / 14110072 / 10/17/18
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS
-9-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Corey J. Jahner, one of the attorneys for the Plaintiffs, certify that on October 17, 2018,
I caused the foregoing Motion for Order of Contempt of Court and Entry of Judgment against
Anthony L. Reising and Lacey L. Reising to be filed electronically. This filing was served on all
parties indicated on the electronic filing receipt via the Court’s electronic filing system. For all
other parties, I caused the foregoing Motion to be sent on October 17, 2018 via UPS Next Day Air
to:
Anthony L. Reising
681 Coon Creek Rd.
Metamora, IL 61548-9327
Lacey L. Reising
681 Coon Creek Rd.
Metamora, IL 61548-9327
/s/ Corey J. Jahner
Corey J. Jahner, Esq.
CENTRAL STATES FUNDS
Law Department
9377 W. Higgins Road, 10th Floor
Rosemont, Illinois 60018
Telephone: (847) 939-2470
E-mail: cjahner@centralstates.org
ARDC No. 6313125
October 17, 2018
TM: 568994 / 14110072 / 10/17/18
-10-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?