Brama v. Target Corporation

Filing 86

MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 11/22/2016: Defendant's motion to strike Plaintiff's earlier-filed statement of disputed material facts and motion for summary judgment is denied as moot. (Dkt. No. 58.) Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendant's motion to strike is also denied as moot. (Dkt. No. 66.) Defendant may file a reply in support of its motion summary judgment on or before December 6, 2016. In light of Plaintiff's motion f or summary judgment filed on November 3, 2016, (Dkt. No. 81), Plaintiff's earlier filed motion for summary judgment, (Dkt. No. 56), is denied as moot. Defendant's response to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is to be filed on or before December 13, 2016, and Plaintiff's reply in support of her motion for summary judgment is to be filed by December 27, 2016. The motion hearing date of December 1, 2016 is hereby vacated. The status hearing date of December 1, 2016 is hereby vacated and status is reset for January 26, 2017 at 10:30 a.m.Mailed notice(mad, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
CHRISTINE BRAMA,

Plaintiff,
v.
TARGET CORPORATION,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 14 C 6098
Hon. Marvin E. Aspen

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MARVIN E. ASPEN, District Judge:
We have reviewed Plaintiff’s recently re-filed summary judgment materials, including
her materials in opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, (Dkt. Nos. 79, 80),
and Plaintiff’s newly filed motion for summary judgment and related supporting materials,
(Dkt. Nos. 81, 83, 84). The motion hearing date of December 1, 2016 is hereby vacated. The
status hearing date of December 1, 2016 is hereby vacated and reset for January 26, 2017 at
10:30 a.m.
Having considered Plaintiff’s re-filed materials, Defendant’s motion to strike Plaintiff’s
earlier-filed statement of disputed material facts and motion for summary judgment is denied as
moot. (Dkt. No. 58.) Plaintiff’s motion to strike Defendant’s motion to strike is also denied as
moot. (Dkt. No. 66.) Defendant may file a reply in support of its motion summary judgment on
or before December 6, 2016.
Additionally, in light of Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment filed on
November 3, 2016, (Dkt. No. 81), Plaintiff’s earlier filed motion for summary judgment,

(Dkt. No. 56), is denied as moot. Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary
judgment is to be filed on or before December 13, 2016, and Plaintiff’s reply in support of her
motion for summary judgment is to be filed by December 27, 2016. It is so ordered.

____________________________________
Marvin E. Aspen
United States District Judge
Dated: November 22, 2016
Chicago, Illinois

2