Kopchak v. Capital One Bank USA NA et al

Filing 35

AGREED ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE. Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by the Plaintiff and Defendants: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against Defendants in Larry Kopchak v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., and U nited Recovery Systems, LP.,14 C 6601, are dismissed with prejudice, each party bearing its own attorney's fees and costs, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 1/12/2015. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CAPITAL ONE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION This document relates to: LARRY KOPCHAK, v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. AND UNITED RECOVERY SYSTEMS, LP. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master Docket No. 1:12-cv-10064 MDL No. 2416 Case No: 1:14-cv-06601 AGREED ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by the Plaintiff and Defendants: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against Defendants in Larry Kopchak v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., and United Recovery Systems, LP.,14 C 6601, are dismissed with prejudice, each party bearing its own attorney’s fees and costs, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Civil case terminated. Dated: January 12, 2015 JAMES F. HOLDERMAN United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?