Kopchak v. Capital One Bank USA NA et al
Filing
35
AGREED ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE. Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by the Plaintiff and Defendants: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against Defendants in Larry Kopchak v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., and U nited Recovery Systems, LP.,14 C 6601, are dismissed with prejudice, each party bearing its own attorney's fees and costs, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 1/12/2015. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
IN RE
CAPITAL ONE TELEPHONE
CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT
LITIGATION
This document relates to:
LARRY KOPCHAK,
v.
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.
AND UNITED RECOVERY SYSTEMS,
LP.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Master Docket No. 1:12-cv-10064
MDL No. 2416
Case No: 1:14-cv-06601
AGREED ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by the Plaintiff and
Defendants:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against Defendants in Larry Kopchak v.
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., and United Recovery Systems, LP.,14 C 6601, are dismissed with
prejudice, each party bearing its own attorney’s fees and costs, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).
Civil case terminated.
Dated: January 12, 2015
JAMES F. HOLDERMAN
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?