Royce v. Needle et al

Filing 212

Supplement to Memorandum Opinion and Order entered 2/2/2016. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 2/2/2016:Mailed notice(clw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

MERLE L. ROYCE,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL R. NEEDLE, P.C., et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 15 C 259

SUPPLEMENT TO MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This Court's further review of its lengthy February 2, 2016 memorandum opinion and
order (Dkt. No. 211) discloses that a few -- but important -- words were inadvertently inserted in
error. To correct that error the words "and this Court granted" are stricken from the second
sentence of the penultimate paragraph of the opinion's section captioned "Dismissed
Counterclaims," so that the sentence reads:
On that appointed date Fata requested leave to withdraw Needle, P.C.'s amended
responsive pleadings in order to amend them further (Dkt. No. 106).
And to make the reason for that change clear, the following sentence is added at the end of that
paragraph:
Because this Court did not grant Fata's July 30 motion (Dkt. No. 117), Needle,
P.C.'s amended responsive pleadings remained intact.

__________________________________________
Milton I. Shadur
Senior United States District Judge
Date: February 2, 2016