Frankfurt v. Mega Entertainment Group II et al

Filing 34

MOTION by Plaintiff Vladimir Frankfurt for judgment awarding damage (Exhibit) (jl)

Download PDF
In the Northern District of lllinois, US Court Madimir Frankfurt' Phrn*ff, v. Case No 15ct667 Mega Entertainment Group ll Pavilion Restaurant & Petergof Bsnquet Helt Gary Fishkin Alexander {Al€Dr} Fietd Edward Renko Judge; Manksh s. Snarp IL JULS() DefendanB ctE#?l$8fl' itOTlOFl for iudsmefit awardino damage Nor mmes Plaintiff, Vladimir Frankfurt and in supBort of his motiort states as bllo\,: 1. 2 On April 28,2015. Plaintifi filed Amended Complaint in the Court. On May 1,2015 Private lnvestigator John A Pogvara from JP & Defendantg: Megn ABBmia(eB eerved personally Summone Entertainrnent Group II and Pavilion Restaurant & Petergof Banquet to Halt. 3. Plaintiff hes made sevesl unsuccessful attempt to serve defendants: Flrhkln, Flald and Renko. 4. Court grantad Plaintiffs Motions hr default iudgment in relation to Mega Entertainment Group and Pavilion Restaurant & Petergof Banquet Hail.and dismissal of Defendants: Gary Fishkin, ,Alexander tAiex) Fleld and Edward Renko wlthailt preiudice. Il 5 Defendants onred to Plaintiff in, 2008 $112,000. Calculated interest due is $84,080. Court cost is $475. (See damages and murt cost in Table 1) Whercfole, Plainlrlt prays this Gourt for ihe judgment in favor of ihe Plaintiff and against the Defsndantt' Mega Enlsrtrainment Group ll and Pavilion Restaurant & Petergof Banquat Hall in the amount of $19S,555 VFt- Madimir Frankfurt I a Tahle I Il*m*ger and eaurt aort (Carc # l5cc66?) Debt frorn 2008 Promiesory Not€* lnterest Year 2008 Due. $ lnvestmant 13440 ?IJ11 1344fi 13440 13440 ?o12 1t20aa 13d40 gffi 4444 12110 13440 1060 s n 13440 13440 2013 2o14 2015 13440 g4(ffi FtnalDebt t Pr*mis*rry Nate specifred o o 1W 13440 OYtrall 2015 a 0 &112,000 200s 2010 Debt, $ Pafd.$ 10000 198080 I lZo/s {3440 I intset rate 196$55

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?