Frankfurt v. Mega Entertainment Group II et al
Filing
34
MOTION by Plaintiff Vladimir Frankfurt for judgment awarding damage (Exhibit) (jl)
In the Northern District of lllinois, US Court
Madimir Frankfurt'
Phrn*ff,
v.
Case No 15ct667
Mega Entertainment Group ll
Pavilion Restaurant & Petergof
Bsnquet Helt
Gary Fishkin
Alexander {Al€Dr} Fietd
Edward Renko
Judge; Manksh s.
Snarp
IL
JULS()
DefendanB
ctE#?l$8fl'
itOTlOFl for iudsmefit awardino damage
Nor mmes Plaintiff, Vladimir Frankfurt and in supBort of his motiort states
as bllo\,:
1.
2
On April 28,2015. Plaintifi filed Amended Complaint in the Court.
On May 1,2015 Private lnvestigator John A Pogvara from JP &
Defendantg: Megn
ABBmia(eB eerved personally Summone
Entertainrnent Group II and Pavilion Restaurant & Petergof Banquet
to
Halt.
3.
Plaintiff hes made sevesl unsuccessful attempt
to
serve
defendants: Flrhkln, Flald and Renko.
4.
Court grantad Plaintiffs Motions hr default iudgment in relation to
Mega Entertainment Group and Pavilion Restaurant & Petergof
Banquet Hail.and dismissal of Defendants: Gary Fishkin, ,Alexander tAiex)
Fleld and Edward Renko wlthailt preiudice.
Il
5
Defendants onred to Plaintiff in, 2008 $112,000. Calculated interest
due is $84,080. Court cost is $475. (See damages and murt cost in
Table 1)
Whercfole, Plainlrlt prays this Gourt for ihe judgment in favor of ihe
Plaintiff and against the Defsndantt' Mega Enlsrtrainment Group ll and
Pavilion Restaurant & Petergof Banquat Hall in the amount of $19S,555
VFt-
Madimir Frankfurt
I
a
Tahle I
Il*m*ger and eaurt aort (Carc # l5cc66?)
Debt frorn 2008 Promiesory Not€*
lnterest
Year
2008
Due. $
lnvestmant
13440
?IJ11
1344fi
13440
13440
?o12
1t20aa
13d40
gffi
4444
12110
13440
1060
s
n
13440
13440
2013
2o14
2015
13440
g4(ffi
FtnalDebt
t Pr*mis*rry Nate specifred
o
o
1W
13440
OYtrall
2015
a
0
&112,000
200s
2010
Debt, $
Pafd.$
10000
198080
I
lZo/s
{3440
I
intset
rate
196$55
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?