Wu et al v. Prudential Financial, Inc. et al

Filing 68

Supplement to MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order dated 7/29/2015. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 7/29/2015:Mailed notice(clw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
MICHAEL H. WU and CHRISTINE T. WU,
Plaintiffs,
v.
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case Nos. 14 C 5392 and 15 C 2238

SUPPLEMENT TO MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
After this Court's memorandum opinion and order ("Opinion") dispatching both of these
lawsuits with prejudice had been dictated, transcribed and edited to final form for entry and
delivery to the litigants (all of which was completed by July 28), this Court caused the Opinion
to be dated July 29 to jibe with that previously scheduled court date for the actions. Then after
that work had been completed, this Court received another opposition to the motions of Michael
and Christine Wu that the Opinion had dealt with -- this time from defendants Citigroup, Inc.,
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., John P. Havens and Xiao-mei (Linda) Wang (collectively the
"Citigroup Defendants") -- and that filing has occasioned this supplement to the Opinion.
In principal part the Citigroup Defendants' opposition adopts and echoes the Prudential
opposition that this Court signed onto in the Opinion as fully persuasive.

And that being so, the

Citigroup Defendants' merits-related discussion, like the corresponding discussion in Prudential's
opposition, need not be addressed here.
In sum, what this Court said and held in the Opinion remains intact. These actions are
indeed dismissed with prejudice.

Date: July 29, 2015

__________________________________________
Milton I. Shadur
Senior United States District Judge