Williams v. Pfister et al

Filing 42

MEMORANDUM Order: Petitioner's motion for relief from judgment 41 is denied and, as stated in the language quoted from the September 29 memorandum order, "no further filings from Williams will be accepted in this case." Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 10/7/2015:Mailed notice(clw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.
KEVIN WILLIAMS (#R26594),
Petitioner,
v.
RANDY PFISTER, Warden,
Pontiac Correctional Center,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 15 C 3183

MEMORANDUM ORDER
Most recently this Court issued a two-page September 29, 2015 memorandum order that
reconfirmed once again that the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 1 Petition by Kevin Williams ("Williams") to
obtain federal habeas relief was time-barred under Section 2244(d). That memorandum order
concluded with this paragraph:
Accordingly Williams' most recent submission -- his "Supplement to Motion" -- is
rejected as well. And this Court adds the long-past-due statement that no further
filings from Williams will be accepted in this case.
Unfortunately the indefatigable Williams had apparently already transmitted a
self-prepared Motion for Relief from Judgment that he signed on September 28 and that was not
received by the Clerk's Office here until October 2. That filing continues to display Williams'
unwillingness to understand and accept this Court's rulings. Accordingly that most recent

1

All further references to Title 28's provisions will simply take the form "Section --,"
omitting the prefatory "28 U.S.C. §."

motion is denied and, as stated in the language quoted above from the September 29
memorandum order, "no further filings from Williams will be accepted in this case."

__________________________________________
Milton I. Shadur
Senior United States District Judge
Date: October 7, 2015

-2-