Snider v. Danfoss Power Solutions

Filing 56

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 8/1/2017: On July 12, 2017, Magistrate Judge Johnston entered a report and recommendation 54 that plaintiff's motion 47 for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e) be denied. No timely objection has been filed. The court has reviewed the record and accepts the report and recommendation. Plaintiff's motion 47 for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e) is denied. Plaintiff's moti on for sanctions, to the extent it relies on the court's inherent authority is denied. Defendant is barred from using any of the emails provided to the court for in camera inspection in any summary judgment motion or at trial. Mailed notice (kms)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION Marvel Snider, Plaintiff, vs. Danfoss, LLC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 15 C 4748 Judge Philip G. Reinhard ORDER On July 12, 2017, Magistrate Judge Johnston entered a report and recommendation [54] that plaintiff’s motion [47] for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e) be denied. No timely objection has been filed. The court has reviewed the record and accepts the report and recommendation. Plaintiff’s motion [47] for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e) is denied. Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions, to the extent it relies on the court’s inherent authority is denied. Defendant is barred from using any of the emails provided to the court for in camera inspection in any summary judgment motion or at trial. Date: 8/01/2017 ENTER: ___________________________________ United States District Court Judge Electronic Notices. (LC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?