Russell v. John Doe et al

Filing 40

MEMORANDUM Order: For the reasons stated in this memorandum order, it is expected that attorney Martin will communicate with Russell promptly and carry forward the designated representation in the regular course. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 8/1/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MIKE D. RUSSELL, Plaintiff, v. KITCHEN SUPERVISOR BRUCE JOHN DOE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 16 C 5950 MEMORANDUM ORDER Prisoner plaintiff Mike Russell ("Russell") has filed a hand-printed letter addressed to this Court (Dkt. No. 38) in which he complains that attorney Alan Martin, who had been designated to act as Russell's counsel under this District Court's trial bar program, had not communicated with Russell since his May 24 designation. Because Russell's letter does not reflect the transmittal of a copy to attorney Martin, it constitutes an impermissible ex parte communication. Accordingly: 1. In addition to sending a copy of this memorandum order to Russell, this Court is contemporaneously transmitting copies of Russell's letter and this memorandum order to attorney Martin. 2. It is expected that attorney Martin will communicate with Russell promptly and carry forward the designated representation in the regular course. Date: August 1, 2017 __________________________________________ Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?