McGee et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al

Filing 39

MEMORANDUM Order regarding the Answer filed by defendant Pierce & Associates, P.C. ("Pierce"). Pierce's counsel follows each Rule 8(b)(5) invocation with the statement "and therefore denies them on that basis." Because such a denial is at odds with the pleader's obligations under Rule 11(b), the quoted language is stricken from each of those paragraphs of the Answer. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 11/17/2016:Mailed notice(clw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PATRICK A. MCGEE and LISA MCGEE, Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORGAGE ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 16 C 7435 MEMORANDUM ORDER Pierce & Associates, P.C. ("Pierce"), one of the defendants in this Fair Debt Collection Practices Act action brought by Patrick and Lisa McGee (collectively the "McGees"), has filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses to their First Amended Complaint ("FAC"). Although that responsive pleading is unexceptionable in most respects by making it clear as to what matters are or are not in issue as between the McGees and Pierce in accordance with the notice pleading principles applicable to federal litigation, one pervasive error prompts this sua sponte memorandum order. Nearly two-thirds of the Answer's paragraphs (Answer ΒΆΒΆ 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 16, 17, 21-29, 1 32, 33, 35, 38, 42, 45-55 and 58-66) invoke the disclaimer provision embodied in Fed. R. Civ. P. ("Rule") 8(b)(5) to provide for situations in which no straightforward admission or denial is _________________________ 1 Because McGees' FAC has inadvertently included two paragraphs bearing the number 29, it should be made clear that the text refers to the first of those two paragraphs. appropriate as called for by Rule 8(b)(1)(B). 2 But having done so, Pierce's counsel follows each Rule 8(b)(5) invocation with the statement "and therefore denies them on that basis." But it is of course oxymoronic for a party to assert (presumably in good faith) that it lacks even enough information to form a belief as to the truth of an allegation, then proceed to deny it. Because such a denial is at odds with the pleader's obligations under Rule 11(b), the quoted language is stricken from each of those paragraphs of the Answer. __________________________________________ Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge Date: November 17, 2016 _________________________ 2 This Court expresses no view as to the appropriateness or inappropriateness of any denial or any Rule 8(b)(5) invocation on Pierce's part. Any possible problems in that respect will be left to McGees' counsel to raise. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?