Rhoads v. Westhost et al.

Filing 46

MOTION by Plaintiff Timothy Rhoads for judgment , MOTION by Plaintiff Timothy Rhoads to deposit funds , MOTION by Plaintiff Timothy Rhoads to enforce judgment , MOTION by Plaintiff Timothy Rhoads for forfeiture of property , MOTION by Plaintiff Timothy Rhoads to intervene , MOTION by Plaintiff Timothy Rhoads for protective order , MOTION by Plaintiff Timothy Rhoads to reopen case , MOTION by Plaintiff Timothy Rhoads to seal case , MOTION by Plaintiff Timothy Rhoads for hearing , MOTION by Plaintiff Timothy Rhoads for summary judgment (Rhoads, Timothy)

Download PDF
  1 2 3 Timothy Rhoads  3753 Francisco Ave   Chicago, IL 60618  312 869 4206  seth@solarblu.net  United States District Court  North District Illinois   4 5 6 TIMOTHY RHOADS,  7 Plaintiff,   8 vs.  9 PACE, USHMAN,BOCA, BREDAHLOF,CHAMBERS  10 Case No.: 1:16-cv-07620 DEMAND  Defendant,   11 12 13 14 15 Your Honor, Here is the demand for itemized damages. 1. Zak Boca violated Hippa laws by sharing my information with other employees $100,000 16 This information was provided in confidence and only to help get insurance for the company before I died from full blown aids 17 2. 18 Dan Ushman violated Hippa laws by sharing my information with other employees $100,000 19 This information was provided in confidence and only to help get insurance for the company before I died from full blown aids 20 3. 21 22 23 24 This information was provided in confidence and only to help get insurance for the company before I died from full blown aids. This information was not shared with Andy yet he felt compelled to let everyone know about it and create a further hostile environment. 4. Dan Ushman online harassment and stalking 25,000 Facebook and linkedin 25 26 Andy Pace violated Hippa laws by sharing my information with other employees $100,000 5. 27 Zak Boca online harassment and stalking $25,000 Facebook and linkedin 28 29 6. Zak Boca Threatening freedom of speech $100,000 30 31 DEMAND ‐ 1    Zak boca routinely asked to have articles that were truthful to be removed from one of my web hosting review websites. Articles are currently in quarantine. Pattern behavior several past clients and affiliates and review websites will testify the same pattern of behavior. 1 2 3 4 5 7. Singlehop – Failure to pay for services rendered $100,000 Agreed to pay for programming services, commissions for recovery of invoices and never paid. Other employees will state they are still owed outstanding money for services performed as well. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 8. 9. Westhost – Failure to Agreed to pay for programming services, commissions for recovery of invoices and never paid. pay for services rendered. Other employees will state they are still owed outstanding money for services performed as well. $100,000 Westhost illegal possession of copyrights $350 million Moved servers from Chicago to Utah and content without permission. This information was live for an etended period of time. Discovery will show to what extent and to how long. No license granted. 10. Singlehop Illegal transfer of copy written material $350 million (116 each SH party) Transferred control of all files to new owners without a conversation or permission. No license granted. 14 15 16 17 18 19 11. Brian Chambers – Discriminatory prosecution 100,000 Brian Chambers did not inform authorities of the other discrepancies in the audit that was performed. 12. Zak Boca interfering with a federal witness 1 Million Zak Hired and talked to Marc Bollinger about this case and show him the federal indictement and witness will testify to other strange conversations and behavior as well as misleading information company gave to clients. 20 21 22 13. Brian Chambers coercion, lying to authority 5 million Brian Chambers knowingly did not have jurisdiction but coerced authorities into thinking he did. Screenshots of contract that lived at the time will show this to be factual. 23 24 25 14. Brian chambers violation of affiliate contract $100,000 Brian Chambers decided to not pay Mr Rhoads for his affiliate referrals, or to notify him that he would not get paid. When Mr Rhoads called he got argumentative and hostile. 26 27 28 29 30 15. Brian Chambers violation of privacy agreement $100,000 Brian Chambers violated privacy agreement that was signed between Mr Rhoads and UK2. 16. Brian Chambers defamation of character 5 mllion Brian Chambers had many statements in his affidavit that are incorrect, delusional and defamatory. 31 DEMAND ‐ 2    1 2 17. Zak Boca idle threats $100,000 3 Zak Boca routinely threatened to call his lawyer but never produced one when he wanted you to remove unfavorable articles from the internet. 4 5 18. Brian Chambers failure to provide indemnification $50,000 6 Westhost was contractually obligated to provide an attorney and legal services in the event that Mr Rhoads was sued, which he was. 7 8 19. Singlehop failure to provide indemnification $100,000 (50,000 each) 9 Westhost was contractually obligated to provide an attorney and legal services in the event that Mr Rhoads was sued, which he was. 10 11 20. Andy Pace Discriminatory harassment protected by the civil rights act 5 million 12 Andy Pace continued to harass Mr Rhoads and create a hostile work environment where his coworker friends thought it was acceptable policy to continue to harass Mr Rhoads on a daily basis. 13 14 21. Zak Boca and Dan Ushman allowing a hostile environment 10 million 15 Zak Boca and Dan Ushman was informed of the harassment and di nothing about it but laugh and jokingly walk away. Zak pretends to have no recollection of any events or conversations that occurred. 16 17 18 Zak Boca $123,275,000 Dan Ushman $121,175,000 19 20 Andy Pace $122,300,000 21 Brian Chambers $355,350,000 22 Thank you for very much for your consideration in this complicated matter. Timothy Rhoads 23 24 Dated on this date February 2th 2017  25 /s/Timothy Rhoads  3753 Francisco Ave Chicago, IL 60618  321 869 4206   seth@solarblu.net 26 27 28     29 30   31 DEMAND ‐ 3    1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 DEMAND ‐ 4 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?