Barousse v. Colvin

Filing 12

MEMORANDUM Order: As contemplated by this Court's sua sponte January 10, 2017 memorandum order, plaintiff Colleen Barousse ("Barousse") has provided payment of the $400 filing fee in connection with her Complaint for Administrativ e Review seeking both disability insurance benefits and supplemental security benefits under the Social Security Act. In the meantime a copy of the administrative record has already been delivered to this Court's chambers. Accordingly this Cour t will await word from Barousse's lawyer or the lawyer representing Social Security Commissioner Carolyn Colvin or both as to the timetable for filing the anticipated cross-motions for summary judgment in such Social Security cases. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 1/13/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COLLEEN BAROUSSE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 16 C 10415 MEMORANDUM ORDER As contemplated by this Court's sua sponte January 10, 2017 memorandum order, plaintiff Colleen Barousse ("Barousse") has provided payment of the $400 filing fee in connection with her Complaint for Administrative Review seeking both disability insurance benefits and supplemental security benefits under the Social Security Act. In the meantime a copy of the administrative record has already been delivered to this Court's chambers. Accordingly this Court will await word from Barousse's lawyer or the lawyer representing Social Security Commissioner Carolyn Colvin or both as to the timetable for filing the anticipated cross-motions for summary judgment in such Social Security cases. __________________________________________ Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge Date: January 13, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?