Johnson Sr. v. Frain et al
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM Order For the reasons stated in this memorandum order, this Court is contemporaneously transmitting to Johnson, together with a copy of this memorandum order three unfilled-out copies of the Clerk's-Office-supplied In Forma Pauperis A pplication. Johnson should complete that form and transmit two counterparts to the Court, one addressed to the Clerk's Office for filing and the other to this Court as its Judge's Copy. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 3/24/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
ALLEN JOHNSON SR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
KEVIN FRAIN, LTS Supervisor, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 17 C 2000
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Allen Johnson Sr. ("Johnson") has used the Clerk's-Office-supplied form of "Complaint
Under the Civil Rights Act, Title 42 Section 1983" to assert claims of the asserted deprivation of
his constitutional rights by the Warden, two former Assistant Wardens and Medical Director
Saleh Obaisi -- all affiliated with Stateville Correctional Center ("Stateville," where Johnson is in
custody) -- and Wexford Health Services, Inc., which the Complaint describes as providing
health care services to Stateville inmates under a contract with the Illinois Department of
Corrections. Because Johnson is the unusual (almost unique) pro se prisoner plaintiff who has
actually paid the $400 filing fee up front, this Court turns to the other Clerk's-Office-supplied
form that he filed contemporaneously with the Complaint: a Motion for Attorney Representation
("Motion").
In that respect Johnson has also departed from the norm by actually complying with our
Court of Appeals' directive that he must identify lawyers with whom he has communicated on
his own in seeking representation. But two stumbling blocks preclude this Court's current
consideration of the Motion:
1.
After providing the just-described information, Johnson has added this
statement:
The several law firms have not responded to the plaintiff's
request for civil rights representation yet!!
2.
Just as importantly, Johnson has also not submitted any financial showing
of his inability to retain counsel if a lawyer or law firm were to respond
favorably to his request for representation.
Accordingly the Motion cannot be ruled on at this time, but this Court is
contemporaneously transmitting to Johnson, together with a copy of this memorandum order
three unfilled-out copies of the Clerk's-Office-supplied In Forma Pauperis Application , which is
usable both (1) for requests seeking to have the payment of filing fees excused and (2) for
requests seeking pro bono legal representation. Johnson should complete that form and transmit
two counterparts to the Court, one addressed to the Clerk's Office for filing 1 and the other to this
Court 2 as its Judge's Copy. Meanwhile, because this case will go forward in any event, this
Court is contemporaneously issuing a scheduling order setting an initial status date, and a copy
1
Office of the Clerk
United States District Court
219 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604.
2
Honorable Milton Shadur
United States District Court
219 South Dearborn Street
Suite 2388
Chicago, Illinois 60604.
-2-
of that minute entry is also being transmitted to Johnson.
__________________________________________
Milton I. Shadur
Senior United States District Judge
Date: March 24, 2017
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?