DeSimone v. Danaher Corporation et al

Filing 123

PARTIAL JUDGMENT ORDER UNDER FRCP 54(b) Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 8/6/2020. Mailed notice(cdh, )

Download PDF
Case: 1:17-cv-05232 Document #: 123 Filed: 08/06/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:658 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RONALD DESIMONE, Plaintiff, v. DANAHER CORPORATION, X-RITE, PANTONE, LEICA BIOSYSTEMS, and VIDEOJET TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 17-cv-5232 Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr. PARTIAL JUDGMENT ORDER UNDER FRCP 54(b) Consistent with this Court’s memorandum opinion and order [93] dated November 26, 2019, and its order [107] dated June 8, 2020, as well as the Seventh Circuit’s order [docket entry 7 in Appeal No. 20-2189] dated August 6, 2020, partial judgment is entered on Count IV of Plaintiff’s complaint, which sought a declaration under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 that Plaintiff had not released his claims against Defendants through the vehicle of a “binding term sheet” that the parties’ negotiated at the conclusion of an EEOC mediation in which they participated. Specifically, as reflected in the November 26, 2019 opinion, the Court resolves Count IV in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, declaring that Plaintiff has not released his claims against Defendants because the “binding term sheet” did not reflect a “meeting of the minds”; therefore, no contract was formed, and no claims were released. The Court further determines, as explained in its June 8, 2020 order, that there is “no just reason to delay” the entry of judgment or the taking of an appeal on Count IV, as the declaration that resolves Count IV does not overlap with the remaining “merits” claims in Counts I, II, and III of the complaint. Case: 1:17-cv-05232 Document #: 123 Filed: 08/06/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:659 Dated: August 6, 2020 ____________________________________ Robert M. Dow, Jr. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?