Franklin v. Howard Brown Healthcare Center

Filing 81

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations: Presently before us is the Report and Recommendation ("Report") of Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole on Plaintiff's motion for discovery sanctions. (Mot. for Sanctions (Dkt. No. 56 ); Report (D kt. No. 80 ).) The Report recommends granting Plaintiff's motion and proposes specific sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e). (Report at 1314.) Neither party filed objections to the Report by the deadline. After careful consider ation of the Report and the parties' submissions, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), we hereby adopt the Report and its proposed sanctions. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for discovery sanctions is granted, and the parties will be allowed to present evidence and argument to the jury regarding Defendant's obstruction or failure to preserve electronic evidence. In addition, we will consider appropriate jury instructions regarding this evidence at trial. It is so ordered. Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 11/7/2018. Mailed notice(ags, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOSE L. FRANKLIN a/k/a MONICA JAMES, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) HOWARD BROWN HEALTH CENTER, ) ) Defendant. ) 1:17 C 8376 Hon. Marvin E. Aspen ORDER MARVIN E. ASPEN, District Judge: Presently before us is the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole on Plaintiff’s motion for discovery sanctions. (Mot. for Sanctions (Dkt. No. 56); Report (Dkt. No. 80).) The Report recommends granting Plaintiff’s motion and proposes specific sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e). (Report at 13–14.) Neither party filed objections to the Report by the deadline. After careful consideration of the Report and the parties’ submissions, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), we hereby adopt the Report and its proposed sanctions. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for discovery sanctions is granted, and the parties will be allowed to present evidence and argument to the jury regarding Defendant’s obstruction or failure to preserve electronic evidence. In addition, we will consider appropriate jury instructions regarding this evidence at trial. It is so ordered. ___________________________________ Marvin E. Aspen United States District Judge Dated: November 7, 2018 Chicago, Illinois

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?