Securities And Exchange Commission v. Rungruangnavarat
Filing
31
MOTION by Plaintiff U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for judgment against Defendant Bovorn Rungruangnavarat (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1- Consent of Defendant Bovorn Rungruangnavarat, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Williams, Mark)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
BOVORN RUNGRUANGNAVARAT
Case No. 1:18−cv−03196
Honorable Manish S. Shah
Defendant.
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT BOVORN
RUNGRUANGNAVARAT
Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) respectfully moves
this Court to enter the attached consented-to judgment against Defendant Bovorn
Rungruangnavarat. In support of this motion, the SEC states as follows:
On May 4, 2018, the SEC instituted this case alleging that Defendant engaged in insider
trading. Doc. # 1. On June 14, 2019, the SEC notified the Court that Defendant had made a
signed settlement offer, which undersigned counsel was recommending the Commission accept.
Doc. # 25. The Commission has accepted the offer. Therefore, the SEC respectfully requests the
Court enter the attached judgment against Defendant Bovorn Rungruangnavarat, to which
Defendant has consented. Defendant does not oppose this motion.
Respectfully submitted this 24th day of October, 2019.
By: s/ Mark L. Williams
Mark L. Williams
1961 Stout Street, Suite 1700
Denver, CO 80294-1961
Tel.: (303) 844-1000
Fax: (303) 295-0538
williamsml@sec.gov
John E. Birkenheier
175 West Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL 60604
Tel.: (312) 353-7390
Fax: (303) 353-7398
birkenheierj@sec.gov
Attorneys for the Plaintiff
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on October 24, 2019, Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Judgment
was filed on the Court’s electronic case filing (ECF) system and will constitute service as to all
filing users in this case assigned to the Court's ECF system.
s/ Mark L. Williams
Mark L. Williams
Trial Counsel
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?