Securities And Exchange Commission v. Rungruangnavarat

Filing 31

MOTION by Plaintiff U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for judgment against Defendant Bovorn Rungruangnavarat (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1- Consent of Defendant Bovorn Rungruangnavarat, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Williams, Mark)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. BOVORN RUNGRUANGNAVARAT Case No. 1:18−cv−03196 Honorable Manish S. Shah Defendant. UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT BOVORN RUNGRUANGNAVARAT Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) respectfully moves this Court to enter the attached consented-to judgment against Defendant Bovorn Rungruangnavarat. In support of this motion, the SEC states as follows: On May 4, 2018, the SEC instituted this case alleging that Defendant engaged in insider trading. Doc. # 1. On June 14, 2019, the SEC notified the Court that Defendant had made a signed settlement offer, which undersigned counsel was recommending the Commission accept. Doc. # 25. The Commission has accepted the offer. Therefore, the SEC respectfully requests the Court enter the attached judgment against Defendant Bovorn Rungruangnavarat, to which Defendant has consented. Defendant does not oppose this motion. Respectfully submitted this 24th day of October, 2019. By: s/ Mark L. Williams Mark L. Williams 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1700 Denver, CO 80294-1961 Tel.: (303) 844-1000 Fax: (303) 295-0538 williamsml@sec.gov John E. Birkenheier 175 West Jackson Blvd. Chicago, IL 60604 Tel.: (312) 353-7390 Fax: (303) 353-7398 birkenheierj@sec.gov Attorneys for the Plaintiff 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 24, 2019, Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Judgment was filed on the Court’s electronic case filing (ECF) system and will constitute service as to all filing users in this case assigned to the Court's ECF system. s/ Mark L. Williams Mark L. Williams Trial Counsel 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?