Banner Life Insurance Company v. Brazil et al
Filing
48
MOTION by Cross Defendants Banner Life Insurance Company, Banner Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff Banner Life Insurance Company, Counter Defendant Banner Life Insurance Company for judgment Order in Interpleader (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Janes, Sara)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
BANNER LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
KAREN BRAZIL f/k/a KAREN BRAZIL
BREASHEARS, GWENDA WALTERSBREASHEARS, N.S.B (a minor), and the
ESTATE of JAMES E. BREASHEARS,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:18-cv-03850-SJC-SIS
Defendants.
BANNER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY’S
MOTION FOR FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER IN INTERPLEADER
Banner Life Insurance Company (“Banner”), by its attorneys, Donald A. Murday and
Sara G. Janes, of Chittenden, Murday & Novotny, LLC, states as follows for its Motion for Final
Judgment Order in Interpleader:
1.
On June 1, 2018, Banner filed its Complaint for Interpleader pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 22 and 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) to resolve competing claims to the proceeds of a life
insurance policy, No. 180254211 (the “Policy”), insuring the life of Janes E. Breashears. (See
Complaint for Interpleader, Docket No. 1)
2.
Banner deposited its admitted liability in the amount of $270,884.81 that is in
dispute into the Registry of this Court, subject to this Court’s further orders as to whom among
the Defendants is entitled to receive those proceeds. A true and correct copy of the receipt for
said deposit is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
3.
Defendants Karen Brazil f/k/a Karen Brazil Breashears (“Karen”), Gwenda
Walters-Breashears (“Gwenda”), individually and as Independent Executor of the Estate of
James E. Breashears (the “Estate”), and N.S.B., a minor child, are adverse claimants to Policy
proceeds. Each Defendant has either been defaulted or filed an Answer. (See Docket Nos. 38, 40,
43, 44).
4.
Banner filed its Complaint for Interpleader in good faith and has done all that is
required by law to perfect its interpleader action.
5.
Banner has properly served a copy of this Motion for Final Judgment Order in
Interpleader on the Defendants.
6.
Banner has incurred over $12,157 in attorney fees and costs in bringing this action
($11,579 in attorney fees and $578 in costs).
7.
Banner hereby incorporates as if fully set forth herein the arguments and
authorities set forth in its Memorandum in Support of the instant Motion, filed
contemporaneously herewith.
8.
Banner submits its proposed Final Judgment Order in Interpleader to the Court via
email, in accordance with this Court’s case management procedures.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Banner Life Insurance Company, respectfully requests that this
Court enter an order:
A. Granting judgment in favor of Banner and against Defendants, Karen Brazil, Gwenda
Walters-Breashears, individually and as Independent Executor of the Estate of James
E. Breashears, and N.S.B. (a minor);
B. Releasing and discharging Banner, its successors, assigns, representatives, agents,
attorneys, and all of its affiliated companies, including officers, directors, and
employees from any and all liability under Policy No. 180254211, or arising on
account of the death of James E. Breashears, or any or all of the Defendants, Karen
Brazil, Gwenda Walters-Breashears, individually and as Independent Executor of the
Estate of James E. Breashears, and N.S.B. (a minor), or any person or entity claiming
through them;
C. Permanently and perpetually restraining and enjoining Defendants, Karen Brazil,
Gwenda Walters-Breashears, individually and as Independent Executor of the Estate
2
of James E. Breashears, and N.S.B. (a minor), or any person or entity claiming
through them, from commencing or prosecuting any proceeding or claim against
Banner in any state or federal court or other forum with respect to the proceeds
payable under Policy No. 180254211, or on account of the death of James E.
Breashears and that this injunction issue without bond or surety;
D. Excusing Banner from further attendance in this cause and dismissing Banner with
prejudice from this cause with an express finding that, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, there is no just reason for delaying either
enforcement or appeal of this Order or both;
E. Requiring Defendants to litigate their entitlement to the proceeds of the Policy among
themselves without further involving Banner; and
F. Awarding Banner $12,157 in attorney fees and costs incurred in bringing this action;
and
G. Granting Banner such other and further relief as this Court deems just and
appropriate.
Dated: January 18, 2019.
Respectfully submitted,
CHITTENDEN, MURDAY & NOVOTNY, LLC.
By: /s/ Sara G. Janes
One of the Attorneys for Plaintiff
Banner Life Insurance Company
Donald A. Murday (dmurday@cmn-law.com)
Sara G. Janes (sjanes@cmn-law.com)
CHITTENDEN, MURDAY & NOVOTNY LLC
303 W. Madison Street, Suite 1400
Chicago, IL 60606
(312) 281-3600
(312) 281-3678 (fax)
3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on January 18, 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing Banner
Life Insurance Company’s Motion for Final Judgment Order in Interpleader herein with
the Clerk of the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division,
using the CM/ECF system, which sent notification of such filing to the following registered
CM/ECF participants:
Frances H. Krasnow
HARRISON & HELD, LLP
333 W. Wacker Drive, Suite 1700
Chicago, IL 60606
(312) 332-1111
fkrasnow@harrisonheld.com
Attorney for Defendant Gwenda Walters-Breashears, individually and as Executor of the
Estate of James E. Breashears
Geraldine W. Holt
BIRNBAUM, HADDON, GELFMAN & ARNOUX, LLC
180 N. LaSalle Street, 37th Floor
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 863-2800
gholt@bhgafamlaw.com
Attorney for Defendant Karen Brazil
Lynn N. Weisberg
GARDINER KOCH WEISBERG & WRONA
53 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 950
Chicago, Illinois 60604
(312) 362-0000
lweisberg@gkwwlaw.com
Attorney/GAL for Minor Defendant N.S.B.
/s/ Sara G. Janes
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?