Montano v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al

Filing 25

MOTION by Plaintiff Aurelio Montano for extension of time to file , MOTION by Plaintiff Aurelio Montano for extension of time to file response/reply , MOTION by Plaintiff Aurelio Montano for leave to file excess pages , MOTION by Plaintiff Aurelio Montano to file instanter , MOTION by Plaintiff Aurelio Montano for forfeiture of property , MOTION by Plaintiff Aurelio Montano for hearing , MOTION by Plaintiff Aurelio Montanoin limine , MOTION for Interpleader Deposit (28 U.S.C. Section 1335) , MOTION for Interpleader Disbursement (28 U.S.C. Section 1335) , MOTION by Plaintiff Aurelio Montano to intervene , MOTION by Plaintiff Aurelio Montano for issuance of warrant in rem , MOTION by Plaintiff Aurelio Montano to join , MOTION by Plaintiff Aurelio Montano for joinder , MOTION by Plaintiff Aurelio Montano for judgment , MOTION by Plaintiff Aurelio Montanofor judgment not withstanding the verdict , MOTION by Plaintiff Aurelio Montano for judgment of forfeiture , MOTION by Plaintiff Aurelio Montanofor judgment on partial findings , MOTION by Plaintiff Aurelio Montano for extension of time to file answer (Baumgart, Francis)

Download PDF
Case: 1:21-cv-06867 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/17/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:119 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION AURELIO MONTANO Plaintiff, vs. Defendants. Wexford Health Services, INC. (WHS) Cory Wingerter Trevor Gregerson Leslie Wilking M.Henze, M.D. ) ) ) ) No. 1:21-CV-06867 ) ) Judge: Nancy MALDONADO ) ) ) ) Motion for Continuance Now comes the movant who states in support of the above motion, as follows: 1. Attorney Baumgart, pursuant to Local Rule 83.11(h), was appointed to represent the plaintiff in a Civil Rights action (Pursuant to U.S. Coder; title 42 Sec. 1983); 2. On Jan. 17th, 2023, Attorney Baumgart filed a 2ndAmended Complaint against the defendants in this matter; 3. On Jan. 18th, he sent out summons (with the 2nd Amended Complaint) to all the defendants, via certified mail, attempting service upon them without the expense of having them privately served, and, instead, asking them to waive this formality and accept service informally. 4. They have not yet replied,; 5. Attorney Baumgart expects that they are simply reviewing the 2nd Amended Complaint and will do so within 30 days; 6. After that amount of time, I will take the appropriate action; Wherefore, I ask that you continue this matter to Feb. 20th (30 days) to allow the defendants to respond to the summonses. Fran Baumgart, Esq. Attn. for Plaintiff Montano 105 W. Madison. #1300 Chicago, IL 60602 Web site: FBandJlaw.com Francis.baumgart@gmail.com Case: 1:21-cv-06867 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/17/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:120

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?