Jackson v. Enloe et al

Filing 125

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations:The court has reviewed the magistrate judges June 8, 2018 report and recommendation (R&R) 24 for clear error and agrees with its findings and conclusions. The court adopts the R&R in its entirety. Plaintiffs claims are dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter final judgment. This case is closed. Signed by the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 6/26/2018:mailed notice(pg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Stevie Jackson,
Plaintiff,
v.
Donald Enloe, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No: 15 C 50071

Judge Frederick J. Kapala

ORDER
The court has reviewed the magistrate judge’s June 8, 2018 report and recommendation (“R&R”)
[24] for clear error and agrees with its findings and conclusions. The court adopts the R&R in its
entirety. Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution. The Clerk of Court
is directed to enter final judgment. This case is closed.
STATEMENT
By order dated June 8, 2018, the magistrate judge recommended that this case be dismissed
with prejudice for want of prosecution. No objections have been filed and plaintiff has not
communicated with the court in any manner.
The court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations
of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The court must
review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only
partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.”
Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). “The clear error standard means
that the district court can overturn the magistrate judge’s ruling only if the district court is left with
the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Indus.
Co., 126 F.3d 926, 943 (7th Cir. 1997).
Plaintiff did not object to the R&R and the court finds no clear error in the magistrate judge’s
recommendation that this case be dismissed for want of prosecution. The court therefore adopts the
R&R in its entirety. Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution. Final
judgment will enter.

Date: 6/26/2018

ENTER:
_________________________
FREDERICK J. KAPALA
District Judge