Bernard v. Scott et al

Filing 79

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations: Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") 77 by the magistrate judge that plaintiff's motion to dismiss 72 be granted and that defendant Erica Barnes be dismissed from the ca se with prejudice. After being afforded a sufficient opportunity, neither party has offered any objection to the R&R. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the R&R of the magistrate judge, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Ci v. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the R&R, the court accepts the R&R and Erica Barnes is now terminated from the case with prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 3/19/2018. Electronic notice (kms)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Eric E. Bernard, Plaintiff, v. Roger Scott, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No: 15 C 50277 Judge Frederick J. Kapala ORDER Before the court is a report and recommendation (“R&R”) [77] by the magistrate judge that plaintiff’s motion to dismiss [72] be granted and that defendant Erica Barnes be dismissed from the case with prejudice. After being afforded a sufficient opportunity, neither party has offered any objection to the R&R. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the R&R of the magistrate judge, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the R&R, the court accepts the R&R and Erica Barnes is now terminated from the case with prejudice. Date: 3/19/2018 ENTER: _________________________ FREDERICK J. KAPALA District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?