Nicholl v. Wexford Health Care Source, Inc. et al

Filing 281

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations, This Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Margaret J. Schneider's April 20, 2023, Report and Recommendation 280 and agrees with its findings and conclusions. The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). During the period left open to Plaintiff to make objections to the report and recommendation, Plaintiff did not object . "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). "The clear error standard means that the district court can overturn the magistrate judge's ruling only if the district court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made." Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Indus. Co., 126 F.3d 926, 943 (7th Cir. 1997). The Cour t adopts the Report and Recommendation 280 in its entirety. This case is dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution. Defendants' motion to dismiss 279 is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter final judgment. This case is closed. Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 7/21/2023: Mailed notice (yxp, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Bernard Nicholl (#N-51361),
Plaintiff,
v.
Wexford Health Care Source, Inc., et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No: 16 C 50151
Hon. Iain D. Johnston

ORDER
This Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Margaret J. Schneider’s April 20, 2023,
Report and Recommendation [280] and agrees with its findings and conclusions. The Court may
accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate
judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). During the period left open to
Plaintiff to make objections to the report and recommendation, Plaintiff did not object. “If no
objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected
portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). “The
clear error standard means that the district court can overturn the magistrate judge’s ruling only
if the district court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Indus. Co., 126 F.3d 926, 943 (7th Cir. 1997). The Court adopts the
Report and Recommendation [280] in its entirety. This case is dismissed without prejudice for
want of prosecution. Defendants’ motion to dismiss [279] is granted. The Clerk of Court is
directed to enter final judgment. This case is closed.

Date: July 21, 2023

By:

__________ _______________________________
Iain D. Johnston
United States District Judge