Kemp v. Il. Dept. Of Children And Family Services

Filing 56

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations: Before the court is a report and recommendation (R&R) 55 by the magistrate judge that defendants motion to dismiss for want of prosecution 52 be granted under both Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 37 and 41(b) and t o deny plaintiffs pending motion to compel 46 as moot. After being afforded a sufficient opportunity, neither party has offered any objection to the R&R. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); F ed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R. This case is closed. Signed by the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 12/11/2018:mailed notice(pg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Mario Kemp, Plaintiff, v. IL Dept. of Children and Family Services, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No: 16-CV-50265 Judge Frederick J. Kapala ORDER Before the court is a report and recommendation (“R&R”) [55] by the magistrate judge that defendant’s motion to dismiss for want of prosecution [52] be granted under both Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 37 and 41(b) and to deny plaintiff’s pending motion to compel [46] as moot. After being afforded a sufficient opportunity, neither party has offered any objection to the R&R. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R. This case is closed. Date: 12/11/2018 ENTER: _________________________ FREDERICK J. KAPALA District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?