Lottie v. Riportella et al

Filing 40

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 4/12/2018: This matter comes before the court on the Order, Report and Recommendations ("R & R") 39 of Magistrate Judge Johnston recommending that t he court dismiss this case for want of prosecution. The court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The court m ust review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zem a Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). In this case, the court has received no objections to the R & R (see 39 , showing that objections were due by 4/10/18). The court has reviewed the record in this case and finds that the March 27, 2018 R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the court adopts in its entirety Judge Johnston's R & R. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Final judgment will enter. Mailed notice (kms)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION Tashawnbe D. Lottie, Plaintiff, v. Sheriff Riportella #5098, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 16 C 50271 Judge Philip G. Reinhard ORDER This matter comes before the court on the Order, Report and Recommendations (“R & R”) [39] of Magistrate Judge Johnston recommending that the court dismiss this case for want of prosecution. The court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). In this case, the court has received no objections to the R & R (see [39], showing that objections were due by 4/10/18). The court has reviewed the record in this case and finds that the March 27, 2018 R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the court adopts in its entirety Judge Johnston’s R & R. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Final judgment will enter. Date: 4/12/2018 ENTER: _________________________________________ United States District Court Judge Notices mailed by Judicial Staff. (LC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?