Casciaro v. Combs et al.

Filing 168

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations: This matter comes before the court on the Order, Report and Recommendations ("R & R") 163 of Magistrate Judge Johnston recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss state law claims ag ainst defendant Rydberg and all claims against the unknown officers be granted. The court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. See FED. R. CIV. P . 72(b)(3). The court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johns on v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). In this case, the court has received no objections to the R & R (see 163 , showing that objections were due by March 13, 2020). The court has reviewed the record in this case and finds tha t the February 28, 2020, R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the court adopts in its entirety Judge Johnston's R & R. State law claims against defendant Rydberg and all claims against the unknown officers are dismissed. Signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 3/16/2020:electronic notice(pg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
WESTERN DIVISION
Mario Casciaro,
Plaintiff,
v.
Keith Von Allmen et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 17 C 50094
Judge Philip G. Reinhard

ORDER
This matter comes before the court on the Order, Report and Recommendations (“R &
R”) [163] of Magistrate Judge Johnston recommending that defendants’ motion to dismiss state
law claims against defendant Rydberg and all claims against the unknown officers be granted.
The court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of
the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The court
must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection
or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for
clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). In this case, the
court has received no objections to the R & R (see [163], showing that objections were due by
March 13, 2020). The court has reviewed the record in this case and finds that the February 28,
2020, R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the court adopts in its entirety Judge
Johnston’s R & R. State law claims against defendant Rydberg and all claims against the
unknown officers are dismissed.

Date: 3/16/2020

ENTER:

_________________________________________
United States District Court Judge
Electronic Notices. (LC)