City Of Rockford v. Mallinckrodt Ard, Inc., et al

Filing 119

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations: Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") 118 from the magistrate judge that 18 CV 379 be reassigned based on relatedness. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R and finds that 18 CV 379 and this case are related and th at 18 CV 379 should be reassigned from the Eastern Division to Judge Kapala in the Western Division. A copy of this finding will be forwarded to the Executive Committee together with a request that the Committee reassign 18 CV 379 from the Eastern Division to Judge Kapala in the Western Division. Signed by the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 3/13/2018: Electronic notice (kms)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS City of Rockford, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Mallinckrodt ARD, Inc., et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No: 17 C 50107 Judge Frederick J. Kapala ORDER Before the court is a report and recommendation (“R&R”) [118] from the magistrate judge that 18 CV 379 be reassigned based on relatedness. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R and finds that 18 CV 379 and this case are related and that 18 CV 379 should be reassigned from the Eastern Division to Judge Kapala in the Western Division. A copy of this finding will be forwarded to the Executive Committee together with a request that the Committee reassign 18 CV 379 from the Eastern Division to Judge Kapala in the Western Division. Date: 3/13/2018 ENTER: _________________________ FREDERICK J. KAPALA District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?