Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company v. Harms Grain Equipment, Inc. et al

Filing 37

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations: Before the court is a report and recommendation (R&R) 36 from the magistrate judge that this court dismiss defendant Harms Grain from this case. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the magi strate judges R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R. Defendant Harms Grain is terminated from this case. Signed by the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 3/20/2019:mailed notice(pg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters
Insurance Company,
Plaintiff,
v.
Ricardo Hernandez, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No: 18 C 50053

Judge Frederick J. Kapala

ORDER
Before the court is a report and recommendation (“R&R”) [36] from the magistrate judge that this
court dismiss defendant Harms Grain from this case. Accordingly, there being no written
objection to the magistrate judge’s R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the
R&R, the court accepts the R&R. Defendant Harms Grain is terminated from this case.

Date: 3/20/2019

ENTER:
_________________________
FREDERICK J. KAPALA
District Judge