Hawkins v. City Of Dixon et al

Filing 39

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations:Before the court is a report and recommendation (R&R) 38 by the magistrate judge that the case be dismissed for want of prosecution. After being afforded a sufficient opportunity, neither party has off ered any objection to the R&R. Accordingly, there being no written objection to theR&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R. This case is closed. Signed by the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 11/5/2018:mailed notice(pg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Gabriel Hawkins,

Plaintiff,
v.
City of Dixon, et al.,

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No: 3:18 CV 50085

Judge Frederick J. Kapala

ORDER
Before the court is a report and recommendation (“R&R”) [38] by the magistrate judge that the
case be dismissed for want of prosecution. After being afforded a sufficient opportunity, neither
party has offered any objection to the R&R. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the
R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50
(1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R. This
case is closed.

Date: 11/5/2018

ENTER:
_________________________
FREDERICK J. KAPALA
District Judge