Shatner v. Page, et al

Filing 173

ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and Order denying 171 MOTION to Strike 167 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Thomas Page, C/O Stewart, Lt. Gilbert, Lt Gailes, C/O Dobbs, Captain Pierce, Lt Westerman, Supt Frenzel, Roger Co wan, Ian Oliver, C/O Benefield and 164] MOTION to Strike 163 Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Exhibits MOTION to Strike 163 Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Exhibits filed by Thomas Page, C/O Stewart, Lt. Gilbert, Lt Gailes, C/O Dobbs, Captain Pierce, Lt Westerman, Supt Frenzel, Ian Oliver, Roger Cowan, C/O Benefield. The Court FINDS in favor of Darrin Shatner and against Defendants Thomas Page, Roger Cowan, Ian Oliver, Alan Frentzel, William P ierce, Darryl Westerman, David Dobbs, Keith Benefield, Robert Gales, and Lamont Gilbert on Shatners religion claims - Count 2 and the Court FINDS in favor of Darrin Shatner and against Dennis Stewart and Darryl Westerman on Shatners legal mail claim - Count 6. Further, the Court finds that Shatner is entitled to compensatory damages for his books in the amount of $768.00; that Shatner is entitled to nominal damages in the amount of $1.00 on his legal mail claim and nominal damages in the amount of $1.00 for depriving him of his religious medallion and that Shatner is entitled to punitive damages in the amount of $1,000.00 as set forth above for a total of $1,770.00. The Court ORDERS the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment reflecting the same. Lastly, the Court DENIES as moot Defendants motions to strike (Docs. 164 and 171). See Order for details. Signed by Chief Judge David R Herndon on 2/4/09. (klh, )