Russell v. United States of America et al

Filing 114

CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of United States of America against Kennedy M. Russell, Sr. (see Judgment for specifics). Approved by Judge William D. Stiehl on 3/22/10. (skp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS KENNEDY M. RUSSELL, SR., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 07-CV-084-WDS JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE DECISION BY COURT. This matter is before the court on United States of America's motion to dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Order of this Court dated March 22, 2010, judgment is entered in favor of the defendant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (substituted as defendant for Internal Revenue Service, Gloria Hayes, and Annette M. Jones) and against plaintiff, KENNEDY M. RUSSELL, SR., and those claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Order of this Court dated June 20, 2007, defendant ST. CLAIR COUNTY RECORDER was DISMISSED and that dismissal is now with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Second Amended Complaint filed by the plaintiff on November 1, 2007, plaintiff did not re-name defendants, STATE OF ILLINOIS, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS, OR MICHAEL T. COSTELLO and those defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Third Amended Complaint filed by plaintiff on August 11, 2009, plaintiff did not re-name defendants SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE, CHARLES A. WILSON and INTERNAL REVENUE TAX AND AUDIT SERVICE, INC., and those defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. DATED this 22nd day of March, 2010. NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL, CLERK OF THE COURT BY: APPROVED: s/WILLIAM D. STIEHL U. S. District Judge s/Sandy Pannier Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?