Antoine v. Walker et al
Filing
86
ORDER denying 85 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 11/2/10. (klh, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS NATHAN ANTOINE, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY RAMOS, et al., Defendants. ORDER No. 07-cv-453-DRH
HERNDON, Chief Judge: Now before the Court is Defendants' motion for enlargement of time (Doc. 85). Defendants move the Court for an extension of time to file a reply to Plaintiff's response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. DENIES the motion. The Court
Local Rule 7.1(c) provides in part: "Reply briefs are not
favored and should be filed only in exceptional circumstances. The party filing the reply brief should state the exceptional circumstances." Here, Defendants have not stated the exceptional circumstances warranting a reply brief. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants' motion for enlargement of time (Doc. 85). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this 2nd day of November, 2010.
Chief Judge United States District Court
David R. Herndon 2010.11.02 13:26:04 -05'00'
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
