Jackson et al v. Alton & Southern Railway Co

Filing 49

ORDER directing pro-se plaintiffs to file a response. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff Tracy Jackson's Claims and Integrated Brief in Support, 45 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff Jerome McDonald's Claims and Integrated Brief in Support, 43 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff Emmanuel Rogers's Claims and Integrated Brief in Support. Responses due by 12/22/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 11/24/08. (amv)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS TRACY JACKSON, EMMANUEL ROGERS, and JEROME McDONALD, Plaintiffs, v. ALTON & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 07-807-GPM NOTICE REGARDING MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT PROUD, Magistrate Judge: Defendants have filed Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 43 & 44), which are supported by a number of exhibits, including affidavits. Lewis v. Faulkner, 689 F.2d 100 (7th Cir. 1982) holds that, when a defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment supported by exhibits, a pro se plaintiff "is entitled to receive notice of the consequences of failing to respond with affidavits to a motion for summary judgment." Lewis, at 102.1 See also, Timms v. Frank, 953 F.2d 281, 286 (7th Cir. 1992). Plaintiffs are hereby notified that Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e) provides that: When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of the adverse party's pleading, but the adverse party's response, by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this rule, must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. If the adverse party does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be entered The Court invites defense counsel to review the Seventh Circuit's suggestion that it should be the practice of defense counsel to include the required notice in the motion. See, Lewis, at 102-103. 1 1 against the adverse party. Lewis requires that a pro se plaintiff be warned that "any factual assertion in the movant's affidavits will be accepted by the district judge as being true unless the plaintiff submits his own affidavits or other documentary evidence contradicting the assertion." Lewis, at 102. Plaintiffs are hereby notified that they may not rest upon the allegations of the pleadings at this stage. Simply restating the allegations of the complaint will not defeat the motion. The Court will accept as true any factual assertion in defendants' exhibits unless plaintiffs submits their own affidavits or other documentary evidence contradicting the assertion. Plaintiffs must file their responses to the motion for summary judgment on or before December 22, 2008. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 24, 2008. s/ Clifford J. Proud CLIFFORD J. PROUD U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?