Fonseca v. Nelson et al

Filing 190

ORDER denying 178 Motion for Sanctions as to Defendant C. David Nelson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 10/5/09. (amv)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ARNULFO FONSECA, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES DAVID NELSON, KEITH BROWN, KEN CLORE, RANDY BUTLER, MIKE JONES, TODD FORT, STEVE SLOAN, SALINE COUNTY, SHERIFF'S OFFICE of SALINE COUNTY, and STATE'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE of SALINE COUNTY, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 08-435-CJP ORDER PROUD, Magistrate Judge: Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions as to Defendant C. David Nelson Pursuant to Rule 37. (Doc. 178). Defendant Nelson filed a response at Doc. 183. Plaintiff seeks sanctions because defendant Nelson has not made pretrial disclosures of the witnesses and exhibits he intends to use at trial, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(a)(3). That Rule requires that such disclosures be made at least 30 days before trial, "unless the court orders otherwise." By virtue of SDIL-LR 16.2(b), this Court has set a different schedule for the disclosure of trial witnesses and exhibits. See also, this District's website at www.ilsd.uscourts.gov. For the foregoing reasons, Motion for Sanctions as to Defendant C. David Nelson Pursuant to Rule 37 (Doc. 178) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: October 5, 2009. s/ Clifford J. Proud CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?