Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Aaron Rents, Inc.

Filing 223

ORDER granting Defendant's oral motion for mental examination of the Plaintiff under Fed. R. Civ. P. 35. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 11/29/2010. (hbs)

Download PDF
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Aaron Rents, Inc. Doc. 223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ASHLEY ALFORD, Plaintiff/Intervenor, v. AARON RENTS, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER A telephonic discovery dispute conference was held on November 29, 2010, regarding a mental examination of the Plaintiff pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 35. The Court determines that Plaintiff has placed at issue her mental status, thus good cause exists for a mental examination. Accordingly the oral motion for a mental examination pursuant to Rule 35 is GRANTED. 1. The examination shall occur, as agreed to by the parties, by December 20, 2010. The parties shall inform the Court if the examination cannot be scheduled by that date. 2. Dr. Michael E. Altoff, Ph.D. shall perform the examination at his office in Carbondale, Illinois. 3. The examination is limited to one day from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. If Dr. Altoff Case No. 3:08-cv-683-MJR-DGW determines he needs additional time for the examination, the parties shall contact the Court. 4. The examination shall not be recorded. 5. Dr. Altoff shall distribute the report required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 35(b) to the parties by January 15, 2011. 6. Defendant Aaron Rents shall provide to Plaintiff Ashley Alford the names of medical professionals for whom Defendant possesses medical records, but no affidavit from a Dockets.Justia.com records custodian. In return, Plaintiff shall provide Defendant with such affidavits or releases for medical records so Defendant may obtain them independently. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 29, 2010 s/ Donald G. Wilkerson DONALD G. WILKERSON United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?