Sydner v. Burns et al

Filing 47

ORDER denying 43 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 11/2/10. (amv)

Download PDF
-CJP Sydner v. Burns et al Doc. 47 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EARL E. SYDNER, JR. , Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY MARKS, DEPUTY SERGEANT VAUGHN, and JOHN DOES 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 08-737-MJR-CJP ORDER PROUD, Magistrate Judge: Before the Court is plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendants' Responses to Plaintiff's First Supplemental Request for Production of Documents. (Doc. 43). Defendants responded to the motion at Doc. 44. The Court construes defendants' response as a request to extend the time for filing objections to the First Supplemental Requests. The Court finds that defendants' failure to timely object to the First Supplemental Requests was the result of excusable neglect, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b)(1)(B). The time to object to plaintiff's First Supplemental Request for Production of Documents is extended to September 17, 2010, the date on which defendants filed their response to the motion and the attached objections. The Court deems the objections attached to Doc. 44 to be timely. Accordingly, plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendants' Responses to Plaintiff's First Supplemental Request for Production of Documents (Doc. 43) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: November 2, 2010. s/ Clifford J. Proud CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?