Mounson v. Walker et al
Filing
86
ORDER GRANTING 85 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 80 Report and Recommendations Denying 65 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, filed by Henry Mounson, 60 MOTION for Leave to File filed by Henry Mounson. Plaintiff's Objections to the 80 R&R are due by June 7, 2010. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 4/5/10. (seg)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS HENRY MOUNSON Plaintiff, v. ROGER E. WALKER, Jr, et al., Defendants. Case No. 08-cv-760-DRH
ORDER HERNDON, Chief Judge: Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 85) to file a Response to the Court's Report and Recommendations ("R&R") (Doc. 80). Plaintiff, acting pro se, explains that he is being delayed in filing his objections, although he does tend to file them, due to restricted access to both his case materials and the law library. Further, Plaintiff explains that he needs time to find someone to assist in the preparation of his objections (the person who had been helping him previously is no longer able to do so), plus additional time to prepare them. Therefore, for good cause, Plaintiff seeks an extension of time to find someone to help him plus an additional 30 days thereafter in which to file his objections. Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 85) is GRANTED, in that Plaintiff is hereby
Page 1 of 2
allowed until June 7, 2010 to file his Objections to the R&R (Doc. 80). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this 5th day of April, 2010.
/s/ DavidRHer|do| Chief Judge United States District Court
Page 2 of 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
