United States of America v. Jones
Filing
9
JUDGMENT in favor of plaintiff United States of America against defendant Suzette Jones, DC, in the amount of $194,026.57 (total as of February 18, 2009), plus interest at the rate of 4.75% from February 18, 2009, to the date judgment is en tered, court costs in the amount of $350.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a)(2), and future costs and interest. Post judgment interest shall accrue at the legal rate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a), shall be computed daily and shall be compounded annually until this judgment is satisfied in full. Case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge David R Herndon on 2/23/09. (rmb )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SUZETTE JONES, DC, Defendant. JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE DECISION BY COURT. This action came to hearing before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 7). IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED by Order of Court dated February 23, 2009 (Doc. 8). Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff, United States of America, and against Defendant, Suzette Jones, DC, in the amount of $194,026.57 (total as of February 18, 2009), plus interest at the rate of 4.75% from February 18, 2009, to the date judgment is entered, court costs in the amount of $350.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a)(2), and future costs and interest. Post judgment interest shall accrue at the legal rate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a), shall be computed daily and shall be compounded annually until this judgment is satisfied in full. Case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.------------------------KEENAN G. CASADY, CLERK February 23, 2009 APPROVED: /s/ DavidRHer|do| BY: /s/Robin Butler Deputy Clerk CIVIL NO. 08-CV-763-DRH
CHIEF JUDGE U.S. DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?