White v. Lambert et al

Filing 150

ORDER denying 142 Motion Stay Defendants' Summary Judgment Motion and Order an Answer from All Defendants and to File an Appearance by Counsel and to Allow Time to Complete Pending Discovery Requests in Pending Case, Instanter Motion to Stay Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 6/18/10. (amv)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DONNIE D. WHITE, Plaintiff, v. GREGORY LAMBERT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 09-293-DRH-CJP ORDER PROUD, Magistrate Judge: Before the Court is plaintiff's Motion to Stay Defendants' Summary Judgment Motions. (Doc. 142). Contrary to the title of the motion, the motion asks the Court to strike, not stay, defendants' motions for summary judgment, Docs. 136 and 138. As grounds, plaintiff states that no attorney has filed an entry of appearance for the moving defendants, and that defendants have not filed an answer. These grounds result from plaintiff's misunderstanding of the order on preliminary review, Doc. 27, in which the Court directed all defendants to file "an appropriate responsive pleading." A motion for summary judgment is an appropriate responsive pleading. Further, there simply is no requirement that an attorney file a separate entry of appearance; counsel's filing of a responsive pleading constitutes an entry of appearance. Plaintiff also suggests that the motions are premature because he has not yet completed discovery or obtained affidavits from witnesses. The motions raise failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Pursuant to Pavey v. Conley, 544 F.3d 739 (7th Cir. 2008), the issue of exhaustion must be resolved before proceeding to discovery on the merits of the underlying claims. The motions for summary judgment are not premature, and there is no reason to strike or stay them. For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's Motion to Stay Defendants' Summary Judgment Motions (Doc. 142) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: June 18, 2010. s/ Clifford J. Proud CLIFFORD J. PROUD U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?