Barghouti v. Holder et al
Filing
80
PROTECTIVE ORDER and ORDER GRANTING 79 MOTION for Protective Order (Agreed) filed by Monroe, Frank B. Eovaldi, D. Holder. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 7/6/11. (alg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EIAD BARGHOUTI,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
D. HOLDER, et al.,
Case No. 3:09-cv-00318-GPM-DGW
Defendants.
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Pending before the Court is the parties’ Motion for Agreed Protective Order (Doc. 79),
filed on July 5, 2011. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), the Court finds
there is a good cause to enter an order protecting the confidential information. Wherefore, the
Court hereby GRANTS the parties’ Motion for Agreed Protective Order.
WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.
The names of the inmates housed at Menard Correctional Center on July 13 and
14, 2007, in North 2 Segregation Cell house, Cell numbers 1-30 through 1-40 and 3-30 and 3-40
shall be kept confidential.
2.
The identification of all correctional officers assigned to the tactical team on duty
on August 14, 2007, shall be kept confidential.
3.
The identification of all sergeants assigned to the tactical unit on August 14, 2007,
shall be kept confidential.
4.
Any policies and procedures regarding the use of force at Menard Correctional
Center shall be kept confidential.
5.
Any policies and procedures regarding tactical team unit video recording
procedure and for shakedown of inmate cells and inmate extraction of cells shall be kept
confidential.
6.
Confidential Material shall be disclosed or made available only to the following
persons: (a) counsel of record or other licensed attorneys participating in the litigation; (b)
personnel who are specifically assisting in this litigation; (c) outside consultants or experts
specifically retained by counsel to perform investigative work, advise counsel or otherwise assist
in this litigation; and (d) with respect to the materials described in paragraphs 4 and 5 above,
only, persons who are questioned with respect to such matters in deposition or at trial. In the
event confidential materials are used or discussed in a deposition, those portions of the
deposition and any confidential exhibits should be designated confidential on the record and not
publicly available.
7.
Nothing in this Order shall preclude Plaintiff’s counsel from using information
obtained through the review of Confidential Material for purposes of this Litigation so long as its
nature as confidential material is not revealed.
By way of example, only, persons whose
identities are Confidential Material pursuant to paragraph 1 above may be interviewed, and
potential witnesses with whom confidential information may not be shared may still be asked
questions about individuals who are disclosed as being sergeants assigned to the tactical unit on
August 14, 2007 (confidential pursuant to paragraph 3 above), so long as in so doing Plaintiff’s
counsel does not indicate that such person was a sergeant assigned to such tactical unit. Plaintiff
may correctly identify the John Doe defendants in his amended complaint even if the source of
the correct names of such defendants is Confidential Material.
2
8.
Persons designated in paragraph 6 as persons to whom Confidential Material may
be provided shall not use, disclose or disseminate any Confidential Material other than for
purposes directly related to this litigation and shall not disclose or disseminate Confidential
Material to any others, including the Plaintiff, Eiad Barghouti, #R57069, without prior written
permission of the Illinois Department of Corrections or by Order of the Court. Persons to whom
Confidential Material is revealed shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the Court for purposes of
enforcement or a violation of this Order. Such persons shall be subject to such relief as is
deemed appropriate by the Court, including sanctions.
9.
A person designated in 6(b), (c) or (d) shall not have access to any Confidential
Material until he or she has read a copy of this Order and has indicated in writing that he or she
has read a copy of this Order, agrees to be bound by it and to be thereby subject to the court’s
jurisdiction. Copies of all such agreements shall be made available to the Department’s counsel
at the conclusion of this action upon request.
10.
In the event any Confidential Material is used in any proceeding herein prior to
the trial of this matter, it shall not lose its Confidential status through such use and the parties
shall take all steps reasonably required to protect such confidentiality.
11.
All Confidential Material shall be kept safely and securely within full custody of
counsel or others entitled to access thereto pursuant to this Order. Additional copies of any
Confidential Material may be prepared under supervision of counsel and shall be treated as
Confidential and maintained securely. Any documents prepared by counsel or their personnel
referring to or quoting from Confidential Material shall also be treated as Confidential and
maintained securely.
3
12.
Maintenance of the confidential status of any such Confidential Material shall be
subject to further order of this court and nothing herein shall preclude any party from applying to
the court for modification of this Order. The parties reserve the right to make application to the
Court upon not less than five days’ notice to seek permission to modify the provisions of this
Order. Counsel shall first seek to resolve by agreement, and without involvement of the Court,
any disputes regarding confidential designations.
13.
After the termination of this litigation, including all appeals, the portion of the
Court’s record containing a copy of the Confidential Material shall be ordered sealed so as to
prevent dissemination to the public.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 6, 2011
____________________________
DONALD G. WILKERSON
United States Magistrate Judge
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?