Blake v. USA

Filing 29

ORDER GRANTING 28 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Byron Blake. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 11/7/2011. (ssd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS BYRON BLAKE, Petitioner/Defendant, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent/Plaintiff. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 09-555-GPM CRIMINAL NO. 06-30146-01-GPM MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MURPHY, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Byron Blake’s motion and affidavit requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. This Court previously denied Mr. Blake’s motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and declined to issue a certificate of appealability. It is clear that Mr. Blake is indigent, and the Court cannot find that the instant appeal is not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Walker v. O’Brien, 216 F.3d 626, 631-32 (7th Cir. 2000) (explaining that the standard governing the issuance of a certificate of appealability is more demanding than the standard for determining whether an appeal is taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis on appeal). Mr. Blake’s motion (Doc. 28) is GRANTED. Because this is a collateral proceeding attacking Mr. Blake’s underlying conviction, the Court finds that the filing fee provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b) do not apply. See generally Walker, 216 F.3d at 628-29 (holding that the Prison Litigation Reform Act does not apply to any requests for collateral relief under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241, 2254, or 2255). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 11/07/11 s/ ZA ctàÜ|v~ `âÜÑ{ç G. PATRICK MURPHY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?