Brandenburg v. Earl L. Henderson Trucking Co., LLC et al

Filing 113

ORDER striking 105 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 112 Motion to Strike ; finding as moot 112 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; finding as moot 112 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. The Court ALLOWS Earl L. Henderson Trucking up to and including January 5, 2011 to file its motion for summary judgment. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 12/22/10. (klh, )

Download PDF
-DGW Brandenburg v. Earl L. Henderson Trucking Co., LLC et al Doc. 113 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JULIE BRANDENBURG, Plaintiff, v. EARL L. HENDERSON TRUCKING, CO., LLC, and PREMIUM TRANSPORTATION STAFFING, INC., Defendants. ORDER HERNDON, Chief Judge: No. 09-0558-DRH Now before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to strike (Doc. 112). Plaintiff moves the Court to strike Defendant Earl L. Henderson's motion for summary judgment for violation of the Local Rules. Plaintiff is correct. Defendant Earl Henderson's motion for summary judgment does violate Local Rule 7.1(d). Local Rule 7.1(d) provides in part: No brief shall be submitted which is longer than 20 doublespaced typewritten pages in 12 point font. The motion is 15 pages and the memorandum in support is 21 pages, therefore, Earl L. Henderson's combined motion and memorandum are well over the 20 page limit. Moreover, Local Rule 7.1(d) also provides that additional page requests are not P age 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com allowed. Thus, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to strike (Doc. 112) and STRIKES the motion for summary judgment (Doc. 105 & 106). The Court ALLOWS Defendant Earl L. Henderson Trucking up to and including January 5, 2011 to file a motion for summary judgment that complies with the Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this 22nd day of December, 2010. David R. Herndon 2010.12.22 11:04:57 -06'00' Chief Judge United States District Court P age 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?