Murphy v. Bayer Corporation et al

Filing 40

ORDER granting 39 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 8/27/2010. (dsw).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS -----------------------------------------------------------IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND RELEVANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION -----------------------------------------------------------This Document Relates to: Pamela Hamilton v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20051-DRH-PMF) Claire Keultjes v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20012-DRH-PMF) Marlene Meadows v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20009-DRH-PMF) Valerie Kozak v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20024-DRH-PMF) April Dymacek v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20047-DRH-PMF) Susan Hargrave v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20074-DRH-PMF) Rhonda Bagley v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20121-DRH-PMF) Anne Marie Eakins v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20010-DRH-PMF) Lauren Murphy v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20011-DRH-PMF) Marie Becker v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20032-DRH-PMF) Alyssa Stellmaker v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20056-DRH-PMF) X : : : : 3:09-md-02100-DRHPMF MDL No. 2100 Judge David R. Herndon

Alaina Klarquist v. Bayer Corp., et al. : (3:09-cv-20056-DRH-PMF) Kimberly Kirk v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20061-DRH-PMF) Wendy Gute v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20064-DRH-PMF) Amy Clay v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20073-DRH-PMF) Jennifer Engholm v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20080-DRH-PMF) Lindsey Schacherl v. Bayer Corp., et al. : (3:09-cv-20093-DRH-PMF) Adrianna Cornell Pinto v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20094-DRH-PMF) Raunda Smith v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20095-DRH-PMF) Sarah Mansour v. Bayer Corp., et al. : (3:09-cv-20143-DRH-PMF) Kelly Haynam v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20167-DRH-PMF) Marie Stephenson v. Bayer Corp., et al. (3:09-cv-20168-DRH-PMF) Cynthia Hale v. Bayer Corp., et al. : (3:09-cv-20021-DRH-PMF) --------------------------------------------------------------------_______________________________________

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' unopposed motions for leave to amend their complaints to add Bayer Schering Pharma AG as a named defendant. Upon consideration of Plaintiffs' motions the Court finds as follows: Plaintiffs' motions for leave to amend for the purpose of adding Bayer Schering Pharma AG as a named defendant are GRANTED. Further, as requested, the Court will allow Plaintiffs 14 days from the granting of this motion to amend their complaints in accordance with the method set forth in Case Management Order # 17. SO ORDERED: /s/ DavidRHerndon DATE: August 27, 2010

Chief Judge United States District Court