Nunez v. Bayer Corporation et al

Filing 42

ORDER granting 41 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 8-19-2010. (dsw) Modified on 8/19/2010.

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS -----------------------------------------------------------X 3:09-md-02100-DRH-PMF MDL No. 2100 Judge David R. Herndon ORDER IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ : (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES : PRACTICES AND RELEVANT PRODUCTS : LIABILITY LITIGATION -----------------------------------------------------------This document relates to: Nunez v. Bayer Corporation et al., 3:09-cv-20037-DRH-PMF Moran et al. v. Bayer Corporation et al., 3:09-cv-20076-DRH-PMF Hall v. Bayer Corporation et al., 3:09-cv-20123-DRH-PMF Terrase, et al. v. Bayer Corporation et al., 3:10-cv-20020-DRH-PMF Schmidt v. Bayer Corporation et al., 3:10-cv-20013-DRH-PMF Hensley v. Bayer Corporation et al., 3:10-cv-20040-DRH-PMF Levy v. Bayer Corporation et al., 3:10-cv-20019-DRH-PMF -----------------------------------------------------------X : ORDER This matter is before the Court on the above Plaintiffs' Motions for Extension of Time to Serve Amended Complaints that were previously filed with this Court pursuant to Case Management Order Number 17 on Defendant Bayer Schering Pharma AG (3:09-cv-20037 Doc. 41; 3:09-cv-20076 Doc. 32; 3:09-cv20123 Doc. 22; 3:10-cv-20020 Doc. 18; 3:10-cv-20013 Doc. 21; 3:10-cv-20040 Doc. 22; 3:10-cv-20019 Doc. 18). After considering Plaintiffs' motions, the Court orders as follows: Each Plaintiff's motion for an enlargement of time in which to serve the previously filed Amended Complaint on Defendant Bayer Schering Pharma AG is GRANTED. Further, Plaintiffs shall have 14 days from entry of this Order to mail and e-mail the Amended Complaints, as instructed in paragraphs III.D.2 and 3 in Amended Case Management Order #9. SO ORDERED: /s/ DavidRHerndon Chief Judge United States District Date: August 19, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?