Greenville IL et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. et al

Filing 351

JUDGMENT REGARDING SEALED DOCUMENTS (NJR/dka).Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/19/2013. (dka, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
CITY OF GREENVILLE, IL; VILLAGE OF
COULTERVILLE, IL; VILLAGE OF EVANSVILLE, IL; VILLAGE OF FARINA, IL; CITY OF
GILLESPIE, IL; CITY OF CAMERON, MO; CITY
OF CONCORDIA, MO; CITY OF CARBONDALE,
KS; CITY OF MARION, KS; MIAMI COUNTY
RURAL WATER DISTRICT NO. 2; CITY OF
OSWEGO, KS; CITY OF JASPER, IN; VILLAGE
OF MONROEVILLE, OH; CITY OF UPPER
SANDUSKY, OH; CRESTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES; ILLINOIS-AMERICAN WATER CO.;
MISSOURI-AMERICAN WATER CO.; INDIANAAMERICAN WATER CO., INC.; IOWAAMERICAN WATER CO.; OHIO-AMERICAN
WATER CO.; CHARITON MUNICIPAL WATERWORKS; and VILLAGE OF OTTAWA, OH,
individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Case No. 10-cv-188-JPG-PMF

Plaintiffs,
vs.
SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC., and
SYNGENTA AG,
Defendants.
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER
and PRAIRIE RIVERS NETWORK,
Intervenors.

JUDGMENT REGARDING SEALED DOCUMENTS
This matter having come before the Court and the Court having rendered a decision,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the following documents may not be
maintained under seal in this case:

Doc. 112 (main document);
Exhibits 1-5, 8-13, 17, 19, 23, 25, 28, 29, 31, 32, 36, 37, 40, 47, 49, 54, 57, 58-60, 68, 69,
71, 79, 95, 107, 116, 117, 119, 123, 134, 144, 146, 152, 157, 159, 165, 167, 169, 170,
175, 176, 181, 182, 185, 187, 193-197, 199, 207, 209, 217-219, 222-224, 226, 228, 229,
231, 232, 238, 241, 249, 255, 272-275, 278, 288-293, 298, 306, 318, 325, 329, 330, 332334, 338, 345, 346, 348, 357-360 and 363-365 to Doc. 112;
Doc. 114;
Doc. 116;
Doc. 121;
Doc. 127;
Doc. 128; and
Doc. 134.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the following documents shall be
maintained under seal in this case:
Exhibits 14-16, 18, 20-22, 24, 26, 27, 30, 33-35, 38, 39, 41-46, 48, 50-53, 55, 56, 61-67,
70, 72-78, 80-94, 96-101, 103-106, 108-115, 118, 120-122, 124-133, 135-137, 139-143,
145, 147-151, 153-156, 158, 160-164, 166, 168, 171-174, 177-180, 183, 184, 186, 188191, 200, 201, 203-206, 208, 210-216, 220, 221, 227, 230, 233-237, 239-240, 242-248,
250-254, 256-271, 276, 277, 279-287, 297, 299-305, 307-317, 319-321, 323, 324, 326,
327, 331, 335-337, 340-344, 347, 349-356, 362 to Doc. 112;
Exhibits 338-348 to Doc. 115.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the following Exhibits to Doc. 112
may be not be maintained under seal but may be redacted as follows:
Exhibit 6: Hertl Dep. 77:6 and 77: 23 redacted;
Exhibit 7: Hawkins Dep. 7:21 redacted;
Exhibit 102: salary information redacted;
Exhibit 138: name and position/title of employee redacted from pp. 1 and 2;
Exhibit 192: name and position/title of employee redacted from pp. 1 and 3;
Exhibit 198: name and position/title of employee redacted from p. 1;

2

Exhibit 202: name and position/title of employee redacted from each page;
Exhibit 225: p. 3 redacted;
Exhibits 294, 295 and 296: names/code names of chemistry compounds redacted;
Exhibit 322: names of nonparty employees whose compensation packages were being discussed redacted
Exhibit 328: private compensation rate redacted; and
Exhibit 339: identity of individual employee redacted.

DATED: March 19, 2013

NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL, Clerk of Court
s/Deborah Agans, Deputy Clerk

Approved:

s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE

3