Williams v. Hulick et al

Filing 29

AMENDED SHOW CAUSE ORDER. Plaintiff need not provided completed USM-285 forms identifying John Doe and Jane Doe Defendants. Rather, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint identifying the John Doe Defendants by name, description and work address by 4/11/11. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 3/10/11. (alg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EUGENE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. DONALD HULICK, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 10-cv-00206-GPM-DGW AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE This matter is before the Court, sua sponte, on the issue of service of process. On November 15, 2010, United States District Judge G. Patrick Murphy issued an Order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A which stated, "Service shall not be made on Defendants John Doe and Jane Doe until such time as Plaintiff has identified them by name on a USM-285 form and in a properly amended complaint. Plaintiff is ADVISED that it is Plaintiff's responsibility to provide the Court with the names and service addresses for these individuals" (Doc. 8) (emphasis in original). To date, Plaintiff has failed to submit the USM-285 forms and file an amended complaint identifying the John Doe and Jane Doe Defendants. Plaintiff SHALL file an amended complaint identifying the John Doe and Jane Doe Defendants by name, description and work address by April 11, 2011, or SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by April 11, 2011, why he has failed to do so. Plaintiff is WARNED that the failure to file an amended complaint identifying the John Doe and Jane Doe defendants or show adequate justification for not doing so SHALL result in a report and recommendation that these Defendants be dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution. DATED: March 10, 2011 ___________________________ DONALD G. WILKERSON United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?